Jump to content

Talk:Location-based service

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by 2409:4081:170c:799e:b8d9:2313:f705:f468 (talk) at 01:17, 17 August 2024 (Blog link: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The following text was formerly at Location Based Services

[edit]
Location Based Services (LBS) are client-server applications that provide location-specific data to mobile devices.
The most basic of these is used in mobile phones, which can prefix the local area code to phone numbers. A similar local mapping of "0", "911", "411" and other location-independent numbers, is also a Location Based Service.
A GPS locator does not provide a LBS, because the broadcast data doesn't change based on the user's location.
The introduction of LBS into the mobile consumer arena took hold during the Internet boom. If the user location is known, web applications can tailor services appropriately.
The first platform to offer this possibility to developers was the Palm VII, released in 1999. The Mobitex network provided the wireless PDA's current zipcode to the application web server. The first two LBS applications came in the box with the Palm VII -- Weather.com, and the Etak/Metrotraffic application known as TrafficTouch. Both provided geo-contextualized data without user intervention.


Discuss

[edit]

I want to ask to everyone that read this article: is there LBS that used in wi-fi or wimax?? this LBS not uses a GPS/satellite, but the proses is done in the router. is that possible?? hope there is some one help me.. please contact : labuffer_pra@yahoo.com thank you.

Quote: "In the UK, networks do not use trilateration; LBS services use a single base station, with a 'radius' of inaccuracy, to determine a phone's location."
Is there a proper reference for this statement? I found this evidence in my own data as well and am now looking for a paper or white paper mentioning this fact. (lxo@cs.nott.ac.uk)


Follow up on Discuss, there is more on LBS, Intel is heavily researching this field and other universities are already working on some projects, most of them not limited to mobile phones. More work should be done on this subject to fully explain it. Also please check the External Links and the validity of the out side sources or projects.


There are now products from the major players in the Indoor Wireless Network space WiFi (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiFi) like Cisco, Aruba Networks, Symbol, PanGo Networks, AeroScout, Ekahau, NewBerry, etc. which enhance the functionality of the WiFi access point to allow "location". The Access point is the fixed component of a WiFi network that is wired to the campus LAN. In a typical WiFi location application, the signal strength (RSSI) of the WiFI client device (such as a laptop, or handheld computer) is collected and compared between all of of the Access points that can detect the signal of the client, using triangulation software similar to the way a GPS functions. Today, accuracy of RSSI-based indoor WiFi location is between 6 and 12 meters depending on the building layout, and specific vendor implementations. Many of the WiFi location software vendors also manufacture their own proprietary "beacon" tag which is basically a small battery operated WiFi transmitter that you can attach to something that you wish to track. This tag transmits every so often and a graphical display shows you where the asset is currently located. Most WiFi beacon tags are RFID class 4 active tags. Some just transmit layer 2 packets at pre-programmed intervals, others are actual WiFI clients with an IP address and can respond to events, support external sensors (temperature, contact closure, push button, telemetry data, etc). The software packages that collect and display the location information gathered from the WiFi access points is getting more sophisticated each year; currently allowing asset tracking, sorting, inventory, and support complex rules engines that can generate alerts based on asset movement, proximity, battery level, and other characteristics. Kb4ffe 19:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lst of Products and companies? Why?

[edit]

I've removed the list of Products and companies - it's basically a list of adverts - even if it much of it does go to their 'WP articles' (most of those are adverts anyway). --Matt Lewis (talk) 12:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The list has been changed to only include companies that are notable enough to have their own articles. This is unfair to those you can't though. I'm deleting per WP:EL and WP:NOT. --Matt Lewis (talk) 16:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:TGLASSEY - fine by me... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.125.107.87 (talk) 09:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Unfortunately a link to a discussion about whether humans really need location-based services has been deleted. I think this contributes significantly to the discussion in the field of location-based services therefore I have added the link again, I don't see a COI and definitely not spam —Preceding unsigned comment added by ExperientalMarketer (talkcontribs) 11:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Being a blog, it fails WP:EL --Ronz (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My locasan sarvis block ho gayi 2409:4081:170C:799E:B8D9:2313:F705:F468 (talk) 01:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


improving text?

[edit]

Can an expert check over the text? I wonder it it needs some improving. For example the first sentence in "History" reads: "Today the question about LBS (Location Based Services) is not what they are inside of but rather what they are not an active part of and the answer is, "very little"." . This statement is rather a sweeping generalisation and not true outside of mobile computing devices, so makes me wonder how trustworthy the rest of the article is: could an expert do a check and rewrite? thanks! (I can tell the original writer that the vast majority of the items in my home do not have location based services, for example, neither my toothbrush nor my set of screwdrivers nor my kitchen utensils!). --137.108.145.21 (talk) 13:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Location-based service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:42, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Glassey

[edit]

There's a large chunk of the history, entirely uncited, which strongly attributes various advancements in LBS to Todd Glassey. While I cannot speak to these claims, the entirety of these edits were made in a short time period (March 12-14, 2012) by a single IP-address, coinciding somewhat with Todd Glassey's lawsuits against a large number of technical companies regarding their use of what he considers his LSB related patents. Given the strong possibility that this information came from a biased source, along with the complete lack of citations to back it up, I recommend it be excised. I will do so myself eventually, but thought it best to lead with a discussion. LordQwert (talk) 22:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Location-based service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Location-based service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Glassey 2

[edit]
  • Re #Todd Glassey, the article is a trainwreck. In 2018, IP editor User:31.173.87.139 added Todd Glassey [1] as well as nonsense [2] [3].
  • Re dubious tag are a part of virtually all control and policy systems which work in computers today - that's just nonsense.
  • It needs a major cleanup, possibly going through the history to remove POV edits would be the easiest. Widefox; talk 14:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning Up Todd Glassey Edits

[edit]

It looks like not much cleaning up has actually been done on this, I'm going to try fixing it up a bit.22:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Mikkelangel (talk)