Jump to content

User talk:Goodnightmush

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 10:38, 27 August 2024 (Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:Goodnightmush/Archive 3. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Goodnightmush
User talk:Goodnightmush
Contributions
User Page

Talk Page

Contributions

Click here to leave me a message.

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Graham Beards
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Dreamy Jazz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Technical news

Miscellaneous


Administrators' newsletter – August 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Isabelle Belato
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Izno

CheckUser changes

removed Barkeep49

Technical news

  • Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
  • Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

Arbitration


Evasion

Hi, how are you? These IP address appears to be Xiaomichel evading the block, same style of changes: [1] and [2]. JacktheBrown (talk) 16:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also these two users: Rusoscal and Pumconi who vandalized the page Capuchino[3] of the Spanish Wikipedia are obvious sockpuppets of Sapsby/Xiaomichel (they wrote practically the exact same things that Sapsby wrote here on the English Wikipedia; as you can clearly see by looking at their only contributions:[4][5] ). And he also vandalized the page Café expreso[6] through many IPs; eliminating its Italian origin and trying to transform it into something French... [7] 82.55.77.241 (talk) 16:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JacktheBrown: Looks like things are quiet so far with the relevant pages protected, but feel free to post anything new to the SPI. There's nothing I can do about the Spanish wiki, though. ÍGoodnightmushTalk 17:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your answer.
Potential sock (I'm not completely sure): [8]. JacktheBrown (talk) 19:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Wars involving Tunisia

To create a Wikipedia page on wars involving Tunisia, one can structure it similarly to the provided well built pages such as Egypt or the Kingdom of Morocco's military history. The page shall be divided into sections based on historical periods, such as the Hafsid dynasty, Ottoman Tunisia, the Beylik of Tunis, and modern Tunisia. Each section should list significant conflicts, their combatants, outcomes, and relevant treaties or events.

I litteraly don't understand why you did not even read my version.

Please tell exactly what the current one is accurate.

Best regards 37.169.32.11 (talk) 16:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I protected List of wars involving Tunisia because the page has been edited by one or more users using multiple accounts to edit the page in violation of Wikipedia policy. I apologize if you are unconnected to those accounts and have been trying to make constructive edits. If so, you are still welcome to discuss them and request that they be made on the article's talk page. You could also make an account which will, after make enough constructive contributions elsewhere, be allowed to edit the page. GoodnightmushTalk 17:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the explanation and for your vigilance in maintaining Wikipedia's standards. I understand the need to protect the integrity of the page, and I appreciate the opportunity to discuss any potential edits on the article's talk page. I'll certainly consider creating an account to contribute more effectively. In the meantime, I'll share any suggestions I have through the talk page to help ensure the accuracy and completeness of the content. Thanks again for your understanding and for your work on Wikipedia.
Still I worked a lot on the page I have edited. Because the one you restore is very incomplete and SHALL be improved.
Best regard 37.169.32.11 (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then I will republish it. Please read it and compare, you will see 1) the amount of work, 2) the completness of the page. Oilyvertwist (talk) 19:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]