Jump to content

Talk:Peter Hendy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Adam Williams (talk | contribs) at 12:16, 29 August 2024 (That Daily Mail story: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Untitled

Removing the link to 'Peter Hendy's Myspace page' as clearly this is nothing to do with him, the text is direct copied form wikipedia, and it appears to be a 'fan' site of some sort. If indeed it is Peter Hendy's myspace, then my god, TFL's press agents are scraping the bottem of the barrel to an extent they're soon gonna start tasting wood.

Suggest page move

I suggest this page be moved to clear the 'Peter Hendy' space for a disambiguation page. I don't think the "British Peter Hendy" is any more notable than the "Australian Peter Hendy". Any suggestions for a suitable title for the British Peter Hendy? Lester 22:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peter Hendy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peter Hendy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That Daily Mail story

All the reporting I found on the prostitution claims put forth by Daily Mail- which boiled down to just British tabloid The Standard, trying to replace the Daily Mail citation (which is a depreciated source), come from reporting allegedly from an interview conducted by British tabloid The Sun. When I searched on The Sun's website, the article or interview wasn't there, which to me suggested it may have been retracted at some point. Cheese2863 (talk) 12:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the controversy section appears to have been inserted by User:Garethdennis this morning. Whilst I am not unsympathetic given the issues that have ended up being aired in the media today, I am not convinced that Gareth is the best person to be in a position to follow WP:NPOV. It may be appropriate to revert or try to rewrite some of these edits accordingly. Adam Williams (talk) 12:16, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]