User talk:MegaHL90

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hi, MegaHL90, and welcome to Wikipedia!

On behalf of the Wikipedia community, I would like to thank you for your contributions. You're already off to great start. I see a future for you among the throngs of Wikipediholics! If you need assistance with titling new articles, please see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions go to Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ. If we've been so inattentive as to not have the answer in any of those places, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Finally, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.

Additional tips

Here are some extra tips to help you get familiar with Wikipedia:

For Wikipedia policies and guidelines, see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
Find everything in the Directory.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, the Sandbox is for you.
If you wish, introduce yourself at the new user log.
If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Tasks in the Community Portal.
If you want to attributes edits to yourself from before you established an account, try this.
Always remember to Upload Images with the correct Copyright tags.
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your name and the date. You can change your signature on your preferences page.
Most importantly, be bold!

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and I hope to see you around! —Cuivi é nen, Friday, 28 April 2006 @ 00:49 UTC

License tagging for Image:000047.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:000047.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Removal of cleanup resources

Seeing as the article The Mastermind of Mirage Pokémon did, in my views, need a cleanup, I wish to hear your views on why the template isn't needed, or, by Wikipedia policies, why you didn't leave a comment under my rationale on the talk page. Please discuss this issue. --Tetsuya-san (talk : contribs) 05:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

4Kids Entertainment

Please stop re-adding voice actors and writers to the list of 4Kids leaders; unless they run the company, they should not be included.

Regarding your addition "{{Note: Please do not remove this information, signed, Wikipedia Staff.}}" I would be interested in learning what your position with Wikipedia is, as I am an administrator. tregoweth 00:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; just don't do silly stuff like that again. :) Also, if you want to leave a message to people, it's best to use their talk page (User talk:Tregoweth, for example) instead of their user page (User:Tregoweth). If you have any questions or there's anything I can help you with, just let me know. tregoweth 01:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:268950904.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:268950904.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell 14:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:WestLakeLogo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WestLakeLogo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell 14:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:000047.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:000047.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell 14:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Maddie_blaustein.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Maddie_blaustein.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:268950904.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:268950904.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Durin 15:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Zarustica

FYI, My corrections to Pete's credits are correct - I work with Pete at 4Kids, so I can vouch for their authenticity. Pete was never Tunnel Rat on G.I. Joe, and he did indeed voice the characters Drew, Zigzagoon and Medicham on Pokemon. Any sites that claim otherwise are wrong.

Image Tagging Image:2107683023.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:2107683023.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 20:57, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GI Joe

Sorry Mega, I don't work on Sigma Six, so I'm not sure who's who on that show. MrKawfy

Sonic X: Fourth season announcement?

People keep reinserting that there has been a fourth season announced. That is not completely true, but it most likely going to happen at this point. Can you link me to a website where it says that a new season will air? Thanks :) -- RattleMan 00:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply :) I heard that some people think those announcements are for Episodes 53-78, which I believe still haven't aired in Japan yet. Some others think it's for both 53-78 airing and 79+. I hope it's both! -- RattleMan 01:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No prob

No problem. :) —tregoweth (talk) 01:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Alternatives4.kl.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Alternatives4.kl.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 01:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page

This is your username, not MegaXL95. As such, those pages have been deleted and your user page and user talk page protected from being moved which appears to be what had happened.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher C. Adams and Pete Capella

Christopher C. Adams is not an alias for Pete Capella/Matthew Charles; the credits for Yu-Gi-Oh GX's third season list them separately. Thus, I've removed your redirect page linking the two.

DoKnowButchie 03:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Emilywilllamsphoto.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Emilywilllamsphoto.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. hbdragon88 02:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:942736 20070822 screen005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:942736 20070822 screen005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pokeranger art.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pokeranger art.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Operation: Z.E.R.O.

I have nominated Operation: Z.E.R.O., an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation: Z.E.R.O.. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 00:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Zeroposter0001.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Zeroposter0001.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Image003_(2).JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Image003_(2).JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:CedarBRT

A tag has been placed on Template:CedarBRT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:28, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BustaRhymes3.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:BustaRhymes3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the article Global Peace Festival (USA)

I remember tagging this article for removal since it contained only an article to an external site, and i have to say i am quite pleasantly surprised with the changes made now i have another check on it! Well deserves praise apart, i wanted to give you two pointers on creating artices:

Don't remove speedy deletion templates on articles you created, even if you edited it in a way that invalidates the template. An admin stopping by will simply decline those templates. If you are affraid that your article would be removed, simply add {{hangon}} under the tag that says {{db-}}, which will delay removal.
If you are creating an article, you might want to tag it with {{underconstruction}} at the top of the page. This signals people you are still working on it, which will prevent CSD's most of the time.

That was if for the technicalities i guess :). Thanks for contributing a fine article! and with kind regards, Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 09:08, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jeff Berman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jeff Berman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Berman. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 13:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Schuym1 (talk) 13:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I clicked on the wrong user. Schuym1 (talk) 13:12, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:BustaRhymes3.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:BustaRhymes3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Cedar Logo2468.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Cedar Logo2468.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Cornell scream.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cornell scream.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 18:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Serena Berman

I have nominated Serena Berman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serena Berman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mosley Music Group

I've noticed that you have been constantly re-adding images to Mosley Music Group. Fair use images, such as album covers, are not permitted in discography articles. Please do not add them again.—Kww(talk) 21:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Advanced Challenge.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Advanced Challenge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:P1-Advanced.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:P1-Advanced.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Outta Here Official Album Cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Outta Here Official Album Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon

I loathe Pokemon. Seriously. In fact all manga and Japanese comics. Grrrrrr you. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 21:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Pokémon voice actors

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Pokémon voice actors, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

redundant to List of characters in the Pokémon anime series

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{(Dinoguy1000)} 21:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Pokémon voice actors

I have nominated List of Pokémon voice actors, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon voice actors (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{(Dinoguy1000)} 22:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Er...

[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Why? -sesuPRIME ^{talk • contribs} 22:56, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, information in the intro is inevitably duplicated within the article's infobox. To use video games as an example; the developer, release date(s), platforms, etc. would all be in the infobox and the intro. And I don't think linking to the "Series episodes" section is needed for the later seasons, and seasons 1-5 still need series links in the infobox. Cheers. -sesuPRIME ^{talk • contribs} 23:46, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bus station articles

I see you have been creating lots of articles on bus stations on the I-35W Bus Rapid Transitway. Considering how little information there is (and is likely to be) for these stations, would it not be better to have them all on one article? Quantpole (talk) 00:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Lakeville North (MVTA station)#Name of article

Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Talk:Lakeville North (MVTA station)#Name of article. Thank you. Matjamoe (talk) 17:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Duart logo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Duart logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MegaHL90 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason, I find this endlessly amusing (that is, you warning yourself about speedy deletion of an image). =D 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 19:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Timbaland Presents Shock Value 2

You have paid complete disreguard to the inuse message at the top of the article. Please do not do so again. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello MegaHL90! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Michael Perreca - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Caren Manuel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Matt Levin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lindsey Warner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B.S.

		The Original Barnstar
		I just have to give you this barnstar, because it is something that you truly deserve for all of your hard and continuous work on all of the Pokémon episode lists. You do a great job adding in episodes, removing cruft, vandalism, and unconfirmed titles, and sticking to all of Wikipedia's policies at the same time; something that happens very rarely in fandom articles. Thank you for all of your fantastic work on one of the most neglected aspects of the franchise here on Wikipedia; you really deserve it. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 21:19, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gundalian Invaders 3.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gundalian Invaders 3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TomWayland1.jpg

Did you forget to add a license tag for this image when uploading.?

Wikipedia takes copyrights seriously, so images need to have an appropriate license tag

You may wish to read Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#For_image_creators which will assist you :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and past moves

First, do not make cut and past moves of pages. This is against Wikipedia's policies as it destroys the edit histories of the page. Second, the moves you made to the the Bakugan Battle Brawlers episode lists were completely inappropriate. These are lists of episodes and the names of the pages should reflect that. —Farix (t | c) 23:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Romaji title

The "Romaji Title" entry is not for a direct translation of the Japanese title. It's for the romanized form of the Japanese title.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robby Sharpe for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Robby Sharpe, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robby Sharpe until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Akerans (talk) 00:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Kaminsky

Hi, I just deleted this page following a complaint at OTRS that the contents did not relate to Eva Kaminsky. I followed your sources (IMDB is not a reliable source by the way) and the roles listed did not match those in the article. You also had an unsourced alias that was not at all obvious. For obvious reasons I have deleted the page. While there is no objection to recreation of an accurate article, I suggest that you take more care with creating BLPs and ensure that new articles have reliable sources and reflect the correct information. Thanks. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon episode lists

I am attempting to make these pages better. There is no reason to have it as (## Episodes Total) when (## episodes total) will suffice. The bolding and capitalization is entirely unneccessary. And also, the hidden notes you are putting in the page are also wholly unnecessary. And my edits are not vandalism.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michelle Newman for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Michelle Newman, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Newman until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 10:21, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Global Peace Festival 01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Global Peace Festival 01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christopher Kromer

The article Christopher Kromer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any evidence that this individual meets the notability requirements. He's only had bit parts and voice-overs, he's not there yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 22:56, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Long Gone1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Long Gone1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ground Zero1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ground Zero1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:49, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NorthstarLine

Template:NorthstarLine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Peace Festival since you contributed to the article. Borock (talk) 10:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mechtanium Surge.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mechtanium Surge.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mechtanium Surge.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mechtanium Surge.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 20:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christina Rodriguez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christina Rodriguez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Rodriguez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 02:54, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lindsey Warner

The article Lindsey Warner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:V, WP:N, can't find reliable, secondary sources to demonstrate the notability or existence of this dub artist.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker ^{talk to me} 20:26, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shannon Conley

The article Shannon Conley has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 01:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Priscilla Everett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priscilla Everett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscilla Everett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 00:12, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gundalian 4.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gundalian 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MechtaniumSurge4 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MechtaniumSurge4 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ShayTards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ShayTards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShayTards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 19:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. When you recently edited Unification Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Fauntleroy II for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Fauntleroy II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Fauntleroy II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Status 03:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited METRO (Minnesota), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metro Transit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Global Peace Festival 01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Global Peace Festival 01.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Unification Church

Template:Infobox Unification Church has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:37, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carrie Keranen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carrie Keranen, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dinkytown talk 07:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:METRO Vehicle1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:METRO Vehicle1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 17:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:METRO Vehicle2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:METRO Vehicle2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:METRO Vehicle1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:METRO Vehicle1.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:11, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:METRO Vehicle2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:METRO Vehicle2.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Minnesota Valley Transit Authority may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Opperman Drive [[Thomson Reuters]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Yep, I'll fix it. Thanks for letting me know. - MegaHL90 (talk) 21 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Tajproductions.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tajproductions.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:39, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tracy Jack

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tracy Jack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Soler, Rebecca Honig

Hello MegaHL90, I have see it that you 9 years ago make a mistake! about Rebecca Soler and Honig. Soler and Honig not same!! Soler is also actress and Honig not. Honig voice Cream from 2005-09 and Soler not!--Maxie1hoi (talk) 21:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Liza Jacqueline Kaplan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Liza Jacqueline Kaplan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New York City Audio Productions

Template:New York City Audio Productions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. czar 22:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MegaHL90. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MegaHL90. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:METRO MinnesotaLogo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:METRO MinnesotaLogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 06:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blackhawk Park & Ride

The article Blackhawk Park & Ride has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article about a parking lot essentially amounts to a run of the mill issue. Since the only reference is broken, there is no way this article meets the general notability requirements.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolotta (talk) 22:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucariomovieposter.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucariomovieposter.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Minnesota Valley Transit Authority lines

Template:Minnesota Valley Transit Authority lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vanessa Yardley

The article Vanessa Yardley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BLP with no valid sourcing (IMDb and TV.com as 'External links' do not count at all towards notability), this is is effectively a WP:BLPPROD-type situation, and so article should be deleted unless sourcing is added and notability is demonstrated.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jerry Lobozzo

The article Jerry Lobozzo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not even come close to meeting notability standards

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 03:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diamond-Pearl.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diamond-Pearl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert O'Gorman

The article Robert O'Gorman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

sources lacking, don't appear to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pete Capella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Capella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Capella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 18:02, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"OneRepublic's second album" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect OneRepublic's second album has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 4 § OneRepublic's second album until a consensus is reached. Cherrell410 (talk) 21:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Perreca

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael Perreca, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 02:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]