Jump to content

User talk:GTMotor815

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by GTMotor815 (talk | contribs) at 12:17, 11 September 2024 (September 2024: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

September 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TheProEditor11. I noticed that you recently removed content from 3-Methyl-GABA without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. References removed. TheProEditor11 (talk) 07:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I explained that there are many advertisement links in the item. GTMotor815 (talk) 07:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it allowed to publish the advertisement link to direct the product page of some companies? I don't think so. So I deleted these links. If it is correct, I would like to identify more links to delete. If not, please share me the reasonable explanation. Thank you. GTMotor815 (talk) 07:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am looking forward to your reply. Thank you. GTMotor815 (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is allowed to link to company websites, if they are a WP:RS that supports the cited content. Just because it is a company website does not automatically make it an advertisement-feeling link. It might be, but it might not be. I always recommend new editors go slow and get advice from a relevant Wikiproject (a community of editors many of whom have relevant editing experience) before doing mass edits. DMacks (talk) 11:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry that I got the different answers from the reviewers. Because all these links direct to the commercial products. They are not independent, reliable and only for commercial propaganda. I am very confused with the definitions and standards. If I linked the similar one with the same format, it is identified as an advertisement and block my account. It's unfair. Please check all the links. Thank you. GTMotor815 (talk) 11:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your advice and I will go to community to learn more experience. But please check the links I pointed out. Last time I proposed the similar situation and the other reviewer deleted the links immediately. GTMotor815 (talk) 12:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is not good behavior to treat the people who point out and correct the problem.Please use the same rules and same standards to everyone. GTMotor815 (talk) 12:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]