Talk:Pepper (band)

Jesus, the section about the DVD is foaming at the mouth with delight at THE BEST BAND EVER LOLOLOL!!ZAZA!! releasing a paltry morsel of new material. It's been excised. aubrey 03:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is so utterly biased I honestly can't even tell if it's meant to be sarcastic. andy 21:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't seem to be overly biased until the final section with the caps and adjectives about how swell Pepper is.

I agree, the end of this article is clearly biased and the content really doesn't serve to increase anybody's knowledge of this band, it seems more like a press release to generate hype rather than an encyclopedia article. Perhaps it should be edited to keep the facts, but do away with the parts which create a bias.Paul 18:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 04:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Very much agreed. Opinions are like weeds here, creeping through the facts to the point where they are as common as each other. This article needs a MAJOR makeover. Besides the point, Pepper is a great band and deserve better than a horrifically biased page.

Is there anyway they can state the obvious RHCP similarity.

I cleaned up the article the best I could, removed opinionated material.

POV tag

I reviewed the article and the above comments, I see strong evidence of restoration of NPOV. The tag (undated) is from May 2006, and much of the POV material has been removed. Removing POV tag. Keep up the good work at building a NPOV informative article regarding this band. DocGratis 14:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]