User talk:KiharaNoukan

Newsmax Newsmax Newsmax

I look forward to you berating me about that for the rest of my life.

it was dumb of me, ok? happy now? soibangla (talk) 09:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I point it out, because that is the only actually relevant sourcing that exists anywhere at all to contradict the massive amount of RS that describes Trump as being shot. What's the theory here? A glass bottle dropped from a plane got in between the bullet and Trump, slicing up his ear with fragments? KiharaNoukan (talk) 09:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

reporting doesn't have to contradict it

if the man was shot, they would say he was shot soibangla (talk) 09:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well we have plenty of RS that do in fact say it, in their own words. Some people say the same thing in different ways, that doesn't indicate a dispute with reporting by everyone from BBC to Axios. KiharaNoukan (talk) 09:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just showed you that more don't than do, regardless of your corrections. we need to err on the conservative soibangla (talk) 09:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't gotten around to fact checking your entire list, I've already found that both BBC and WSJ report Trump was shot, despite your claims otherwise. But guess what, they also simultaneously report Trump was injured too! It's almost as if RS do not believe that being shot and being injured are in any way mutually exclusive. You're trying to create a dispute with what multiple RS have reported, that does not exist. KiharaNoukan (talk) 09:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

more don't than do. I am done here. soibangla (talk) 09:36, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. You do not. Many of the sources you reference, without linking, do in fact say that Trump was shot. KiharaNoukan (talk) 10:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Soibangla

Regarding your offer, you can donate to ~~the shooting victims via the official gofundme (hyperlink is in the article)~~ United24, given effective altruism and what I've learned about the proclivities of a certain attendee. Let me know what you have in mind for your end. KiharaNoukan (talk) 23:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Soibangla

Do we accept Snopes as an arbiter of your offer? If not, let me know what we can rely on. KiharaNoukan (talk) 01:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

clarify. haha.

July 17, 2024: This report was updated to add additional documentation of no broken teleprompters and to clarify language Snopes previously used describing a photo showing "a bullet striking Trump."[1]

soibangla (talk) 06:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snopes:

there is photographic evidence of a bullet striking Trump[2]

there most certainly is not. hahaha! soibangla (talk) 07:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd guess the FBI/USSS have already talked to these officers:

Pittsburgh sent 10 officers. Four of them, as we exclusively reported Sunday afternoon, were hit by shrapnel when a gunman opened fire at the rally, killing one man, and wounding Trump and several others. The Pittsburgh motorcycle officers suffered only minor injuries and were treated at the scene. One later went to the hospital. Video from CBS News shows those Pittsburgh officers, just minutes after they were hit with debris, in the stands helping some of the injured, even carrying one to safety.[3]

Sources tell (WPXI) Chief Investigator Rick Earle the officers were just feet away from Trump when shots rang out. The four officers suffered minor injuries from flying debris caused by the bullets. Sources say the officers were hit with either plastic or metal fragments when the bullets struck objects nearby.[4]

soibangla (talk) 08:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so, we now have Pittsburgh news reporting four individuals "just feet away from Trump" suffered minor injuries from flying debris during the incident, while there remains no evidence whatsoever that Trump was struck in the ear by a rifle bullet. a reasonable person might deduce this suggests Trump also suffered a minor injury from flying debris like the other four, but maybe we should wait to see what the FBI/USSS says before the big $50 prize is awarded. soibangla (talk) 10:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Dilanian/Julia Ainsley of NBC report that Secret Service spox confirmed bullet, not glass, struck Trump KiharaNoukan (talk) 05:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wray said the exact nature of Trump's injury remains uncertain: "There's some question about whether or not it's a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear."[5] soibangla (talk) 01:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AP: FBI says Trump was indeed struck by bullet during assassination attempt

Pay up. @Soibangla KiharaNoukan (talk) 15:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will follow up with you in 90 days soibangla (talk) 21:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheetz v. County of El Dorado has been accepted

Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SilverLocust 💬 01:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Hedge fund

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hedge fund, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Dokoupil

Hi there. If you'd still like to pursue the addition of this material, please also look at these sources,[6][7][8][9] where it's been documented that some employees "objected to Dokoupil's tone", that "several staffers at CBS were angered by how Dokoupil conducted himself", that CBS News CEO Wendy McMahon also said the interview did not meet CBS standards, and that Paramount executives disagree about how the matter was handled (with Chair Shari Redstone saying that it was a "mistake" to criticize Dokoupil in public and Co-CEO George Cheeks praising McMahon for stewarding the network's standards). Why does Jan Crawford warrant a mention over these other individuals? What does due material that takes every reliable report about the aftermath of this event into consideration look like? KyleJoan^talk 02:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of this belongs on the article talk page. KiharaNoukan (talk) 05:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but I'm not looking to add more material about this event. This was to help craft a more neutral summary in case you still believe more details are necessary. If not, cool. KyleJoan^talk 05:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]