Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Driggu Florentino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Driggu Florentino

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:GNG, WP:SINGER, or WP:ACTOR. All the references are either the subjects own website, or self-published sources that are promotional in nature. Also appears to have been deleted in the past with the discussion here. The page creator deleted the PROD tag so I am bringing it to AfD. cyberdog958^Talk 01:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Bands and musicians, Music, and Brazil. cyberdog958^Talk 01:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I strongly believe that the deletion of the biography is unnecessary, given that the article was created based on solid and reliable references.

The subject of the biography has sufficient relevance to be included in the encyclopedia, especially within the context of the underground synthpop movement in the Northeast, which reinforces the importance of its preservation.

The biography is well-founded, containing sources that support the facts and a structure that provides appropriate backing.

Deleting the article would result in the loss of valuable information about the subject and, consequently, about an important musical movement within the Brazilian underground scene. The article still has significant potential for expansion, deepening the understanding of the cultural and historical impact of the underground synthpop movement and the unique contribution of the subject.

Keeping this article is a way to preserve and disseminate knowledge about an important part of Brazilian music and culture from the north, which deserves recognition and documentation.

Therefore, removing the article would be a setback in documenting this movement, as the encyclopedia plays a crucial role in recording and preserving cultural diversity.

The biography not only contributes to understanding the underground movement but also highlights the subject's relevance within this musical scene. The Artist was recognized by the Museu da Pessoa as one of the most important people, both in activism and art, please do not remove this biography. https://museudapessoa.org/pessoa/rodrigo-barbosa-da-silva/ https://nonbinary.wiki/wiki/Driggu_Florentino Moniiquedecastro (talk) 05:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete little to no third party coverage.-KH-1 (talk) 09:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The artist is part of the cataloging of a Prestigious Museum, the 'Museu da Pessoa'.

https://viaf.org/viaf/6559165814922859860006/

https://acervo.museudapessoa.org/pt/conteudo/pessoa/driggu-208910

Hi, could you please take a look at these references I found? I believe they demonstrate how important the article is for cataloging visual artists. The information that was removed was correct and well-founded, so it would be great if you could reconsider that. Moniiquedecastro (talk) 22:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Searching, I found a reliable reference in La Vanguardian.

https://www.lavanguardia.com/peliculas-series/personas/driggu-2884960

I believe that is enough. Moniiquedecastro (talk) 22:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Disruptive, out-of-process draftification reverted, and AfD relisted. Any admin may close this at any time. Owen× ☎ 18:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This was subject to G11 and now that it has been cleaned up there's nothing left.—Alalch E. 22:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ARTIST. WP:TOO SOON and lacks reliable sourcing. I am not finding any good sources or evidence of notability. (same reasons as 2022). --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bludgeon

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

http://pb.mapas.cultura.gov.br/agente/222119

https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:G%C3%AAneros_Diversos,_Hist%C3%B3ria_no_Museu_da_Pessoa_(208912).pdf

https://arttere.org/artistas/3946/driggu-florentino

The Visual Artist is widely recognized in his field, and his reputation has been built organically, without the need for paid promotional campaigns.

Like other great names in visual arts, he chooses not to appear in the headlines of major portals.

This decision reflects his commitment to authenticity and artistic integrity, refusing to submit his work to the commercial logic of self-promotion agencies.

His work is so valuable that it deserves a place in prestigious encyclopedias and catalogs on its own merit.

The references that accompany his career are more than enough to ensure the preservation and recognition of his legacy, demonstrating that his art transcends marketing and speaks directly to the public.

It is of utmost importance that Wikipedia accepts this article, as the work of this Visual Artist extends far beyond what we see on major platforms. He has chosen not to pay for promotion, and yet, his work is extremely relevant and deserves to be documented.

Wikipedia plays a fundamental role in helping to preserve the legacy of artists like him, who are focused on the art itself rather than marketing.

Therefore, accepting this article ensures that future generations can recognize and appreciate the incredible contribution he has made to the artistic world. Moniiquedecastro (talk) 21:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Clearly fails in WP:ARTIST. Svartner (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Admin comment I have p-blocked Moniiquedecastro from this page in addition to the blocks previously applied. Star Mississippi 01:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. If the subject was really that “important”, then there would be much more available online. There isn’t; there are zero Google news hits (zero is the same in English and Brazilian Portuguese). Therefore, I must assume that the creator is a fan who thinks their favorite musician must be important, but isn’t. Bearian (talk) 01:09, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An editor Moniiquedecastro insisted on going onto my user page with two other sources. I evaluate them as unreliable. I did several searches, both for his performing and visual arts, and found no relevant and reliable sources. Now I have cookies from Brazil on my device. It takes an order of magnitude more time to refute nonsense than to state the irrelevant claims. My support for deletion is stronger . I suggest salting this article to prevent further abuse of the processes. Bearian (talk) 17:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.