Talk:Internet Archive cyberattack

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Merge proposal

I propose merging Internet Archive cyberattack into Internet Archive. Currently this article is a news report of a single event (WP:NOTNEWS) which I think doesn't deserve an article on its own. Security issues and outages of Internet Archive's services have been common in the past and it would be better to generally describe this (including the event this article is about) in an own section of the Internet Archive's article instead. Alternatively, if this single event would be really that important that it meets the notability criteria I suggest moving this article to something like Internet Archive 2024 cyberattack because as I said it's not the first time the Internet got attacked resulting in an outage.

By the way: Posts of the Internet Archive on x.com (referenced two times) are not reliable sources and even on Internet Archive#History this event is described in more detail than in this whole article. Killarnee (talk) 09:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MountainDew20 and Gideonrmt: Merge proposal: Notifying possibly involved users. Killarnee (talk) 09:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with such a merge.

Note, however, that according to WP:RSPX, As a self-published source, [Twitter/X] is considered generally unreliable and should be avoided unless the author is a subject-matter expert ... Twitter accounts should only be cited if the user's identity is confirmed in some way and as a founder of the Internet Archive (and retweeted by the IA), Brewster Kahle has a verifiable account and is a subject-matter expert. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 09:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the article currently is, it certainly should be merged. In fact, I don't think there's anything in it that isn't already in the main article. I would only change my mind on this if the separate article were greatly expanded to give more detail; does anybody have plans of doing such a thing? *Dan T.* (talk) 16:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Unless this event has a lasting impact in some way I don't see how it could be notable enough for its own article. This event does not yet meet the following criteria for inclusion as per WP:EVENT: lasting effects, geographical scope, depth of coverage, duration of coverage, or diversity of sources. While there are some RS reporting on this, most of them are sources that report on cyber security or related topics. Gideonrmt (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait: I think that, since this article has already been created, we should not rush to a decision. Potentially this incident has legs and, until the dust has settled, I propose that we leave as is. As of today (October 16), I have personally found that the site is still a little unstable and so I imagine that the folks are still dealing with the aftermath of this event. Besides, it is easier to manage this on a stand-alone page while the situation is still unfolding.

Enquire (talk) 03:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since this article is a lot shorter than the part about it in Internet Archive#History, I think this article should be merged or at least moved to draftspace. Gideonrmt (talk) 16:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge for all the reasons already given. Enquire's reasons for waiting don't make sense to me: a merge will leave a redirect page that can be expanded into an article again if unfolding events justify splitting from the main IA article later; and there has not been much editing activity on this page, so no reason to think that the subject will be easier to manage here than in the main IA article. Biogeographist (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. It fits as a section in the Internet Archive article. Lord Zaxor (talk) 02:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]