Jump to content

User talk:Emdad Tafsir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Emdad Tafsir (talk | contribs) at 06:28, 18 October 2024 (Comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

UTRS appeal #80085

Restore TPA yet again. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for using the Unblock Ticket Request System. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. This requires greater discussion than is possible via UTRS. Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here " 
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Deepfriedokra -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Remember, Emdad Tafsir, you attempted to mislead us on 2022-12-24 and have not yet addressed this. You must directly address this. Your UTRS request only talked about your abuse of multiple accounts but did not address your attempt to lie about this. --Yamla (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am remorseful for what I did, and on December 24, 2022, all I wanted was to get unblocked; that's the only reason I prevaricated.
In UTRS, I have admitted why I did it and now how I want to contribute to enriching Wikipedia, but I forgot to clarify the above-mentioned date incident.
I tried to clarify my side, and I am humbly waiting to contribute to Wikipedia again. Thank you. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 04:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yamla
Deepfriedokra Emdad Tafsir (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please address it all in a new unblock request. Please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emdad Tafsir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for edit war and using multiple accounts to support my arguments, I have been blocked for such a long time. I tried by any means to be unblocked in the meantime. I am admitting that what I done was completely wrong, which resulted me my blocks. The block also resulted me some introspections of my wiki editing behaviour. I have totally understood why I was blocked, and I am remorseful for doing so. Now, all I want is nothing but to contribute to enrich Wiki and if such things arise, I will collaboratively edit and will solve the issue and certainly I am not gonna use anymore account beside this one. I am not gonna make this request tedious, I think I have cleared all the issues, and I am eagerly waiting to edit wiki again. Thank you. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 18:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emdad Tafsir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for long term edit warring, using sock puppets in an edit war, inability to edit collaboratively. 1. I am unconditionally admitting that I had tried to establish my edit by using sock puppet accounts. Now, in the period of blocked for 3 years I have totally understood what I can do, and I can't do. If I get unblocked, I will never do this again I promise. If any disagreement arises, I will discuss in the talk page of that very article and will edit collaboratively. 2. I agree that the attempt of 2022-12-24 was inappropriate, and I remorseful unconditionally for the actions. I wanted to get unblocked by any means which was a wrong process. I promise I will not do any thing that will get me banned ever. 3. I am grateful to Wikipedia, I have read a lot of article and information to gain knowledge and academically it helped me a lot. Before getting blocked I have also tried to enrich Wiki by creating new pages that needs to be added in Wiki; but I have also done a number of wrong things which is not allowed. Consequently, I am blocked till now. For this block, I can't edit and contribute to the Wikipedia. For my academic purpose I have to read a number of articles, I see that huge portion of data is outdated and needs to be updated with proper citations, but I can't as I am blocked. 4. This block for three and half years, taught me a lesson what can I do what I can not in the Wiki. I am eager to enrich Wikipedia again by contributing in positive way. You can watch my edits after unblocking If I am breaking any rules. So, to wrap up, I would say, this block is no longer necessary. Thus, I am unconditionally humbly requesting to unblock me to enrich the Wikipedia and please let me know If there anything I missed to address or needs clarification. Thank you. Update (August -13) It's been 12 days but still no response. Can I seek admins assistance? For the block I can't access Wikipedia library. Please send me a disposal in this regard. If anything, I forgot to address please point it. Mentioning blocking admin user:Deepfriedokra (Update: August 15) Please dispose the matter, it's been two weeks but still no decision is made. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 07:49, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CU data shows  Possible block evasion from June, via logged-out editing. This is hard to be sure, though, due to extensive proxy use. --Yamla (talk) 18:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not submit unverified claims. I have never tried to edit Wikipedia without logging in. Both my home and university ISP provide shared IP, which may raise your doubt about my editing without logging in. Please check thoroughly. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 18:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is, you've repeatedly been caught lying to us. That's clearly visible on this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 18:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am unconditionally remorseful for what I did previously.
But this time I am ready to face any consequences for the challenge that your claim is false that I have edited without logging in.
I am humbly requesting you to check again the data please. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 18:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am eagerly waiting for a positive contribution to Wikipedia again, albeit I have made a number of mistakes before. Now, I am remorseful for doing so. But I have also contributed positively before.
This block for four years has made me learn enough lesson for my mistakes. I am humbly requesting to give me the opportunity to contribute again. Thank you. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 19:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emdad Tafsir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, I was tagged edit warring of edit warring in January 2021 for editing Islam and Zakir Naik. I have tried to establish my views there which was definitely wrong. At that time, I was not collaborative that I should be in Wikipedia. As I seen users are reverting my edits, I have used one more account for supporting my edit that was user:TripleCBD. I have done this from the frustration that no one is supporting my edits.

After getting blocked I have denied the claim to get unblocked that user:TripleCBD was not mine. I am regretful for doing so.

As I was not getting unblocked, I have created one more account in April 2021 named user:Char Fasson. Which was also a mistake I am addressing beforehand. I have no idea how to get unblocked, thus I have denied in unblock request that user:Char Fasson was not my account. And I have never used without these two accounts. After user:Char Fasson getting blocked I have never created any account ever and I use shared IP both in my home and university dormitory. Currently I am living at University Dormitory.

After that I have appealed through UTRS, and my talk page access was restored. But till now I have requested twice admitting all my guilts, but procedurally declined.

I have been blocked since January 2021, in this period of more than 3 and half years I have totally understood that what I can and what I can't do in Wikipedia. I have read directive pages from wiki that how to resolve editing conflict by discussing in the talk page and I will do so if I get unblocked and I will never create any other account for edits I assure.

I want to get unblocked as I read Wikipedia pages for academic purpose and sometimes, the pages need corrections such as outdated data or needs cohesion in the sentences etc. FYI, I have tried my level best before getting blocked to do positive contribution in wikipedia and I have created a few pages too. But I have done terrible mistake by doing edit warring and sockpuppeting. Without condition I feel rueful for thus action. I was totally abstained from editing English Wikipedia since April 2021.

I can assure you that I have totally understood the mistake that I have made by doing edit war and including multiple accounts in war which resulted my block, and I assure I Will not breach any rules further. Please give me the opportunity to enrich the Wikipedia. Thank you. Mentioning admin @Deepfriedokra: Emdad Tafsir (talk) 14:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Being blocked does not prevent you from merely reading Wikipedia. It's difficult to get past your attempts to deceive us; just as in The Boy Who Cried Wolf, it's difficult to believe you even if you are telling the truth right now. My suggestion is that you edit another Wikimedia Foundation project where you are not blocked(i.e. Simple English Wikipedia, Wikitionary, the Wikipedia of another language you know) for awhile, and establish a trustworthy record there. Then maybe we can consider unblocking you. 331dot (talk) 15:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emdad Tafsir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have addressed all of the facts I am aware of my mistakes in my previous unblock request, thus I am not rewriting here. Please tell me if anything needs to be clarified. As per the decline reason of last time's request, I want to inform you that I have been editing Bangla wikipedia without breaking rules for long time. Please trust me.

I am eagerly waiting to enrich wikipedia again. For the block I can't access wikipedia library which is so essential for my academics. Please don't extend my punishment. I have been being punished for almost 4 years and please don't deprive me of getting access to wikipedia library. I am badly in need of it.

I have understood every bit of the reasons that I am blocked for, and I will never break any rule I promise. Requesting for unblock beforehand.

Mentioning concerned admin @Deepfriedokra: @Yamla: @MER-C: @SpacemanSpiff: @331dot:

Please don't decline this unblock request as procedural decline.

Update: October-02 Requesting to dispose of the matter. I am collaboratively editing Bangla Wikipedia for long time. I am aware what I can do in Wiki and What I can not. Requesting to Unblock. Emdad Tafsir   ◀ Talk ▶ 15:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see that on bn.wiki you were blocked on 18 September, unblocked on 1 October following promises to improve behavior, and then reblocked the following day following the violation of the unblock terms. It seems quite clear that you are unable to engage constructively on any Wikipedia project at this time. signed, Rosguill talk 19:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


It is inappropriate for you to ping admins rather than waiting your turn. Don't do it again. Additionally, "I can't access wikipedia library" is not a reason to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 08:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Almost twice my appeal was declined procedurally without any answer or observations. I am trying to affirm that admins notice my appeal thus I have mentioned concerned admins.
As last appeal's decline reason, I have addressed the fact that I am editing another Wikipedia without breaking any rules for long moment. To consider the fact I have added that I am also not getting access to the Wikipedia Library.
I have stated all from my side, it would be pathetic if I get again procedurally declined. Thus, I am humbly requesting to consider my request. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 13:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's been 8days since I asked for a block review. Please don't decline this request as procedural decline only.
Humbly requesting you to unblock.
Please trust me. You can add me in your watchlist for supervision. I will not ever break any rules.
I have been editing Bangla Wikipedia for long time without breaking any rules. You can trust me. I am humbly requesting not to extend my punishment. I have learnt my lesson. I know what I can do and what I can't in Wikipedia, and I will positively contribute to Wikipedia to enrich it.
I have clarified earlier all the issues I am aware of. Please mention if anything needs clarification.
It's all from my side. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 10:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on Recent Block Declination

@Rosguill I was not fully blocked. I was just blocked from creating new pages as a number of pages that I have created was not translated properly. Thus creating new pages and moving pages action was blocked. I am editing constructively, you can see my recent contribution. Emdad Tafsir   ◀ Talk ▶ 06:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Emdad_Tafsir&oldid=1251813795"