User talk:Srich32977

This is Srich32977's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28: 2 months

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Your effective reversion of my edit to "Battle of Winchelsea"

Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you effectively manually reverted my edit to the "Battle of Winchelsea" article. While I regret this, I principally want to point out that in doing so you violated WP:SECTIONHEAD by reinstating the second of the two "Sources" section headers (point one: "Be unique within a page, so that section links lead to the right place."). Would you please be so kind as to re-disambiguate them, i.e. rename one of them? —DocWatson42 (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Life and Times of Frederick Douglass

Your edit of Life and Times of Frederick Douglass at 04:59, 15 September 2024, capitalized "Douglass" but did not capitalize any other word in the title, including "Frederick." Is that correct? It makes no sense to me. In fact, putting titles in lower case, as so many Wikipedia editors do in footnotes, makes no sense to me. Maurice Magnus (talk) 11:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citation cleanup

Hey, just making sure you're aware that per WP:RANGE we do not abbreviate numerical ranges for pages or dates. Please make sure you're familiar with the MOS when making style changes across a large number of articles. Remsense ‥ 论 23:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello: WP:RANGE does not address page ranges or dates. Rather, [1] says we should follow a consistent style. (E.g., cites should be consistent in the page ranges presented. That is what I did. Accordingly, please roll back (or revise) your reverts to the various articles. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 01:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect, but I should've checked I was linking MOS:RANGE, cf. MOS:DATERANGE. Remsense ‥ 论 01:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

O.Kay. So who's more correct in these edits? I think mine comply with DATERANGE. – S. Rich (talk) 01:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any abbreviation of a range of dates or pages is incorrect. Always write it out instead. Remsense ‥ 论 01:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Chicago Manual of Style says "123–24" is acceptable. And WP accepts CMS as a citation style. See https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html – S. Rich (talk) 01:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Manual of Style says it's not, except in quotations. Why would we have these guidelines apply everywhere except in citations due to what a different style guide permits? You are misunderstanding what WP:CITESTYLE means in practice; it is not license to ignore what other guidelines like the MOS explicitly require. Maybe WP:CITESTYLE could use a sentence of clarification on this point, but clearly the idea is "different citation styles are acceptable", not "we must allow anything another style guide allows if it's hidden in a citation".Remsense ‥ 论 02:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't believe me—I find it pretty unambiguous and have little idea of how to make it clearer for you—please consider asking on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style or somewhere else for verification or clarification before re-adding MOS violations. Remsense ‥ 论 02:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Srich32977, you have been told many times in the past that abbreviating numbers in ranges here on the English Wikipedia is incorrect. You and I have had multiple discussions on your talk page about this issue. Maybe your memory has failed you; I know mine sometimes does. Please stop abbreviating page ranges. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I shall comply with MOS:PAGERANGE. – S. Rich (talk) 21:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Srich32977 was this edit a mistake in this way? If so, I apologize: just double-checking since I thought we had come to an understanding. Remsense ‥ 论 23:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...and this. My finger is on the WP:DE-block button, Srich32977. Tell me why I should not press it. DMacks (talk) 23:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September thanks

Thank you for improving article quality in September! - Ach, lieben Christen, seid getrost, BWV 114, is one of the pieces in my topic of this year. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ufologists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Contact.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AutoEd config

(from User talk:Citation bot) How is your AutoEd configured that it managed to alter a |pages= parameter to |📃= in Special:Diff/1246281475? Please take a look so future errors may be avoided. Thanks! Folly Mox (talk) 11:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AutoEd did not make the change, I did. – S. Rich (talk) 20:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that same diff, you or a script broke properly spaced author initials by removing the spaces. Please correct your script or other editing method. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

CheckUser changes

Guideline and policy news

Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

Arbitration

The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

Miscellaneous

If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jstor

Hi, rather than just removing vague "via JSTOR"s it would be more helpful to add a proper link to the JSTOR papers, Cheers, Johnbod (talk) 14:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It would be nice to find the JSTOR link. But that is not on my agenda. Rather, there are 6,000 "via JSTOR"s listed on my search. If the cite is using a {{JSTOR= 123455 template, then we see JSTOR with a blue link. I'm seeking to remove the redundant blue link clutter. – S. Rich (talk) 16:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A change to your "agenda" would vastly increase the actual utility of your many edits. In most cases the correct JSTOR link should be super-easy to find. The "clutter" is pretty harmless, frankly. Johnbod (talk) 15:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October thanks

Thank you for improving articles on October! - My story today is a cantata 300 years old, based on a hymn 200 years old when the cantata was composed, based on a psalm some thousand years old, - so said the 2015 DYK hook. I had forgotten the discussion on the talk. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:19, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]