This article was nominated for deletion on 1 July 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
A fact from P. Sathasivam appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 August 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the current Chief Justice of India, P. Sathasivam, was the first law graduate in his family and his entire village?
The page name should be P. Sathasivam (not P .Sathasivam, a pretty obvious typo). This doesn't even warrant a merge discussion. And re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Sathasivam, editing is not a competition. Merge the articles together and bring it to DYK (once it meets the criteria, which it currently doesn't)—you can (and should) list credit for all major contributors in the DYK nom process. czar··17:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
* There is absolutely no reason why this should be merged with or redirected to the new article created by uncletomwood today. It seems some bits in both articles are copied from 'Outlook India' but that can be put right - the older, original article should have been expanded. Also, the Chief Justice assumes office later this month, but uncletomwood's article gives the impression he has already done so.That is wrong.--Zananiri (talk) 21:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If the subjects of the article are the same, it follows that the content should be merged. Where to? The title that best fits the subject, which is the one with the proper spelling. czar··00:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
