User talk:Robert92107

Welcome!

Hello, Robert92107! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Winner 42 Talk to me! 13:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Robert92107, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Robert92107!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello Robert92107, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Carlsbad desalination plant has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Hello, I'm RightCowLeftCoast. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Carlsbad desalination plant because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:California topographical map of proposed HSR route (2014).jpg

Hello, Robert92107. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:California topographical map of proposed HSR route (2014).jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:42, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

California High Speed Rail formatting

Thanks for your contributions to that article. Please considering following the Manual of Style and use section headings and avoid inline external links. Recent editors have been completely ignoring the standard site-wide formatting, which makes the article look very out of place. --hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 02:15, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited California High-Speed Rail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Valley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Robert92107. You have new messages at Talk:Cold fusion.
Message added 14:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Inomyabcs (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Energy Catalyzer

Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. We do not cite press releases and promotional fringe websites as reliable sources in regard to claims regarding 'energy sources' unrecognised by science. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is about time that you started paying attention to the fact that there is some serious work being done on this, and serious money being put behind it. Certainly more data needs to be added, but unless you demand that I put everything out here in completed form, you'll just have to let me build information about this piecemeal.

I further don't think that it is appropriate for you to say that an independent press release that one of the major venture capital firms buying rights to E-cat is something that should be ignored.

It appears to me that you're not neutral on this issue, and need to get a grip on it. Robert92107 (talk) 18:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you trying to right great wrongs? jps (talk) 16:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, (1) he did not examine the sources I used, since he was incorrectly characterizing them; (2) the article does not include recent FACTUAL information which has been reported in reliable sources which is significant to the E-cat topic; and (3) I noticed that re the patent granted last week someone inserted something which that was NOT stated in the patent itself for the purpose of coloring the topic. Thus, the article is NOT neutral, and the lack of neutrality is what should be corrected, not to state definitely that LENR works or doesn't. Robert92107 (talk) 18:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to discuss article content, please do so on the article talk page - though I suggest you read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and WP:FRINGE first - 'neutrality' does not involve giving equal weight to fringe claims regarding supposed sources of energy unknown to science. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is at DRN:Energy Catalyzer. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Guy Macon (talk) 20:39, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please be very careful, if this ends up at ANI you will end up getting banned from cf articles, andy has far too many friends in high places. He baited me into taking him there by using deliberately inflammatory language because he knows everyone over there. You honestly can't win this. InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{InsertTalkHere} 17:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DRN is not WP:ANI. First, we deal with article content, not user behavior. Second, cases are managed by a DRN volunteer mediator (that would be me) rather than the "everyone jumps in" style of ANI. Third, DRN volunteer mediators do not show favoritism or take sides. Please refrain from trying to torpedo the dispute resolution process with comments such as the above. Give us a chance to come to a resolution that everyone is happy with. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest in Wikipedia

Hi Robert92107. I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia and just read through the dispute at E-cat. You wrote some things that led me to believe that you ~might~ have a relationship with the project, Industrial Heat LLC, the investor group, etc. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, Robert92107. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you.

Comments and requests

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by out WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with the with the E-cat project, Industrial Heat LLC, the investor group, or any other entity or person that would be relevant here? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, with please disclose it. After you respond (and you can just reply below), perhaps we can talk a bit about editing Wikipedia, to give you some more orientation to how this place works. You can reply here - I am watching this page. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 01:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. Why would you think that? Nothing I've said even implies that idea! I have no personal connection with the company or any of its people (past or present, to the best of my knowledge). I called the company yesterday and asked if they were still offering shares, and they said no; that has been my only interaction with any of their people (J. T. Vaughn). I also have had no contact or commercial involvement with ANY E-cat or LENR firm or any of those patents or published materials. Of course, I would like their efforts to succeed -- if it can -- but then, don't we all, because the world desperately needs something like that. I am certainly not going to condemn them to failure in advance of their reporting of their efforts. I think they need to be given a fair chance to try, and my section was only indicating what they said about their effort and the business facts involved. I find it bizarre that you can't seem to be able to differentiate facts from opinions.

And frankly, I find it insulting that such an obvious breach of NPOV could be assigned to me, especially when the other editors in conflict are so obvious in their abandonment of the NPOV standard. Time and again they are forcing the argument to be about validation and proof of the system. You only have to read what they wrote to see it! I do agree that care should be taken with respect to claims of validity, but that is not what my dispute is about! To the best of my knowledge every single word in my section is factually true and provable, and if it isn't, I want it to be fixed, but not suppressed as they seem to want to do. THAT is what my dispute is fundamentally about.

Lastly have you even read the section I wrote? It is actually pretty inoffensive, since it states the facts, and just the facts. I am frankly appalled that the Wikipedia mechanism seems to be failing so badly on this article. 2606:6000:C882:6000:A8F6:41F8:B931:69EB (talk) 06:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying that you have no connection with the company. I was concerned that you seemed to have insider knowledge, for instance about Industrial Heat LLC's patenting activities. (I do see that their PCT has published, so it is publicly available information). (About your remark on that... anybody can file a patent application - you don't have to own or control dominating patents in order to file a patent application). In any case, you clearly are a proponent of the technology. Please do be aware that advocacy is closely related to conflict of interest and edits of advocates and people with a COI are often indistinguishable with regard to adding POV to content; please do read the helpful essay, WP:ADVOCACY and please be cautious not to violate WP:SOAPBOX, which is policy. Please make sure to put on a Wikipedia "hat" when you log in, and really strive to listen to others who think differently and try to reach consensus. Good luck! Jytdog (talk) 12:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All the information I put into the section is contained in the two sources I cited. This is why I'm concerned that people are commenting on what I wrote without actually reading the sources, since they are assuming things not in evidence or going on tangents not covered by what I actually said. I feel this is rather like a Twilight Zone episode, since I'm talking about A, and all these people are criticizing Z! As to your statement that "I am clearly a proponent of the technology" that is incorrect. Again, how can you say that with NO evidence? I have said nothing that indicates this; I have said in talk that I would WISH that it could be made to work, but that in no way says that I think it DOES work, or even WILL be made to work! At this point, I am not prejudging the outcome of the business, unlike the other editors. I am hopeful, but only that. I think that logically there are three positions: proponent, opponent, and "agnostic". I fall into the last camp. The other editors are all opponents, and they cannot accept that a reasonable person could disagree with them. Their position is inconsistent with the standards that a Wikipedia editor MUST adhere to! So, when I say what my position is, please do NOT misrepresent what it actually is without some actual evidence to the contrary, and there is none of that, since I have been entirely consistent throughout on what my position is.

BTW, have you ever considered that we do have one natural example of a LENR reaction? Naturally occurring radioactive decay (in which lead is the final element produced in the process) is a low energy nuclear reaction that produces waste heat. Of course, this is a very slow process, and the heat released is very small per reaction, but in relation to the earth's geology in sum it has been critical to our life. So, could there be other examples of ways that LENR could be achieved with other elements? That is the question, and I am not so foolish as to say either that it has been proven OR that it is impossible! 2606:6000:C882:6000:6418:5FAF:422:94D2 (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly a proponent of the technology. You are very far from "disinterested" which is what the third category would be. I have no idea whatsoever what "E-cat" is. I am disinterested. I just read the article Talk page and it is clear on as the nose on your face that you follow this technology very closely and you are very hopeful it will work. As I wrote above, please do read, and be aware of, WP:ADVOCACY and the WP:SOAPBOX - things go much better when everyone is self-aware. Good luck on the article. Jytdog (talk) 20:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't disagree with you more! Let me repeat this again. Of course, I am not disinterested. If I were truly disinterested, I wouldn't be here on Wikipedia trying to get the article updated. (I am far more interested in other things.) I also do NOT follow this subject closely. I have read about it in the past, and recently was looking at it again because I am interested in clean energy technologies in general. I am NOT a proponent of the technology, or am I an opponent either. All I am fundamentally saying is humanity needs to give it a chance. That's why I'm an agnostic where it is concerned. The current company filing and funding appears to be the most serious effort yet to make it work. THAT is why it deserves notice in the article. IF it can be made to work, then great, since we need clean energy technologies. IF it doesn't, then some scientists and engineers will have learned something. The opponents cannot prove that the technology CANNOT work if done correctly. After all, as I said above, in nature we've already got an example of a naturally occurring LENR process. Granted that this is clearly the easiest one, but could a LENR process be made to work with other elements given the right circumstances? Who knows? I don't, but I'm not going to say it's impossible. Isn't that clear enough? 2606:6000:C882:6000:A4B6:EFB1:25D:89B7 (talk) 19:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

606:6000:C882:6000:6418:5FAF:422:94D2, regarding what you call a "LENR", we have an article on that. See Radioisotope thermoelectric generator. (The preceding statement does not imply support or opposition to anything anyone here has written. It is just a link to a related article.) --Guy Macon (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm making a connection between naturally occurring "radioactive decay" of stable atoms and "low energy nuclear reaction", since the former is actually an example of the latter. You don't think that some radioactive atoms are just deciding on their own to decay, do you? No, that type of "decay," which produces waste heat, is triggered by a low energy input in exactly the right way to start the process. (Of course, there are other radioactive atoms which are unstable and very rapidly decay into other atoms, but I'm not talking about those.) I haven't read the LENR article, I'm only pointing to the class of low energy nuclear reactions as an aspect of atomic physics and NOT a man-made device or process that attempts to create that process. Robert92107 (talk) 09:29, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice (no response required; this is just FYI)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Interference with DRN case, possible violation of topic ban. Thank you. Guy Macon (talk) 00:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:California topographical map of proposed HSR route (2014).jpg

Hello, Robert92107. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:California topographical map of proposed HSR route (2014).jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cold Fusion (LENR) - Publications - Current state of research

see Talk in article

CAHSR route

FYI, I've added the track route to the map on the California High-Speed Rail article. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 04:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. James (^talk/_contribs) 04:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Robert92107. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Robert92107. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Robert92107. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Torrey DeVitto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shooting Star. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Statewide Connectivity Map 2016.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Statewide Connectivity Map 2016.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Statewide System Map.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Statewide System Map.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Statewide Population Map 2016.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Statewide Population Map 2016.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Statewide Rail Modernization 2016.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Statewide Rail Modernization 2016.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Business Plan Map.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Business Plan Map.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CAHSR Business Plan Map.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:CAHSR Business Plan Map.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CAHSR Statewide Population Map 2016.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:CAHSR Statewide Population Map 2016.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CAHSR Statewide Rail Modernization 2016.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:CAHSR Statewide Rail Modernization 2016.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CAHSR Statewide System Map.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:CAHSR Statewide System Map.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the CAHSR_ images should be deleted. Robert92107 (talk) 20:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CAHSR San Joaquin Viaduct.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:CAHSR San Joaquin Viaduct.ogg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:2021-02-10-SJRV-IMG 0271-360x270.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:2021-02-10-SJRV-IMG 0271-360x270.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Construction of California High-Speed Rail has been accepted

Construction of California High-Speed Rail, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited California High-Speed Rail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Valley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:CAHSR Corcoran 2-scaled.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:CAHSR Corcoran 2-scaled.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 04:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image was created by CAHSRA, so is in pubic domain. Specifically, it says: "Image was created by the California High-Speed Rail Authority, and they have posted it on their website (News/Renderings). Per state law, image is in the public domain." Robert92107 (talk) 23:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Exhibit 1-3 2023 Update Rpt.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Exhibit 1-3 2023 Update Rpt.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Exhibit 1-3 2023 Update Rpt.pdf

Thank you for uploading File:Exhibit 1-3 2023 Update Rpt.pdf. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 23:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! PD-CAgov. Robert92107 (talk) 11:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you are trying to tell me. — Ирука¹³ 14:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PD-CAgov (inside double braces) indicates that it was created by an agency of the State of Californis, and thus by law is in the public domain. Specifically, the text says it is from the 2023 Project Update Report, published on Mar. 1, 2023. -- Robert92107 2603:8001:5600:42:E498:63EA:8EC5:A0C9 (talk) 00:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PD-CAgov (inside double braces) indicates only that someone posted it on the file description page.

I don't see any text on the file description page that says: "2023 Project Update Report, published on Mar. 1, 2023". — Ирука¹³ 00:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! PD-CAgov

File permission problem with File:CAHSR Corcoran 2-scaled.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CAHSR Corcoran 2-scaled.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 00:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:HSR interiors.png

Thanks for uploading File:HSR interiors.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 02:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ALL images and files have their source denoted. ALL are in the public domain, as ALL works of agencies of the State of California are. These should all be marked as "PD-CAgov" via the upload template. If you do not see a source reference, please let me know and I will add it. Robert92107 (talk) 04:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see a source reference. — Ирука¹³ 04:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most recent image: File:HSR interiors.png

File history shows:

current	00:38, 7 August 2023		1,710 × 1,024 (2.45 MB)	Robert92107 (talk \| contribs)	{{PD-CAgov}} Image is owned by California High-Speed Rail Authority, an agency of the State of California, and is thus in the lic domain.

Robert92107 (talk) 09:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox2 (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at California High-Speed Rail instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This seems more like a WP:CFORK of California High-Speed Rail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Robert92107/sandbox2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 02:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert92107! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 02:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox2 (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at sandbox2. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Robert92107/sandbox2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Your edit to California High-Speed Rail has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:California HSR Project Status2.png

Thanks for uploading File:California HSR Project Status2.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:California HSR Project Status3.png

Thanks for uploading File:California HSR Project Status3.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:California HSR Project Status2.png

The page File:California HSR Project Status2.png has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image was an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links were updated.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:13, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:California HSR Project Status3a.png

Thanks for uploading File:California HSR Project Status3a.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:California HSR Project Status3.png

A tag has been placed on File:California HSR Project Status3.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE THIS CRITICAL ERROR: THE "visiting the page" link in this paragraph is NON-FUNCTIONAL!! Robert92107 (talk) 08:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I apologize, since apparently I misunderstood the file to be deleted ... the '3' version, and not the '3a' version! Yes, deleting '3' is perfectly acceptable.

(Actually, at times I have run into problems trying to replace one map with another altered version of it, since the software appears NOT to be able to distinguish between the two files, and refuses to do the replace. So, the only work-around I know of is to change the file name and upload the new version, and change the main page to point to the new version. I try to maintain a name similar to the original file for historical reference purposes. Robert92107 (talk) 08:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC) )[reply]

Concern regarding User:Robert92107/sandbox2

Hello, Robert92107. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Robert92107/sandbox2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:2024 BP Fig 0-4.png

Thanks for uploading File:2024 BP Fig 0-4.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:2024 BP Fig 2-0.png

Thank you for uploading File:2024 BP Fig 2-0.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:2024 BP Fig 0-4.png

Thank you for uploading File:2024 BP Fig 0-4.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Robert92107/sandbox2

Hello, Robert92107. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on the CAHSR article

Hi Robert, as mentioned on the article talk page on several occasions, you cannot wildly edit the article as you see fit. Generally, editors are expected to follow consensus and the manual of style. As for your last edit, adding overly colloquial phrases in parentheses into the lead is misplaced; without referring to WP:MOS it becomes obvious if you just read over some other articles out there and compare those to your edits. Multiple editors have raised related points on editing and consensus-building numerous times, and from my perspective any talk page exchange with you has become more and more confrontational, which I very much regret. Again from my perspective, you filibuster all discussions by (re)stating your viewpoints instead of engaging with your peers' comments in depth.
In the ideal case, you would change your editing style to become constructive, so we can make the article better as a community. I think everyone would love to work on improvements with you, instead of against you. In the absence of that, however, your edits will continue to be WP:DISRUPTIVE, and will be reverted either by me or other editors.
This is a comment on general editing, so I'm posting it here. For discussions on the CAHSR article, as usual see you on the respective talk page. DracaenaGuianensis (talk) 01:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not write in all capital letters, as you did at Talk:California High-Speed Rail. Doing so considered "shouting" and is disruptive. Your edits may have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated disruptive editing may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Your recent editing history at California High-Speed Rail shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. I'm trying to get textual statements changed so that they are factually correct. Robert92107 (talk) 22:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter whether you are right or not. Do not edit war.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DracaenaGuianensis (talk) 05:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]