Jump to content

Talk:Continent

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mipadi (talk | contribs) at 19:39, 3 November 2024 (3 continents?: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



Centralized discussion on oceania as a continent

Let's use Talk:Oceania (continent), please. fgnievinski (talk) 03:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 May 2024

Oceania is not a continent, Australia is. Otherwise Australia will also be the largest island and not greenland cause it is no longer a continent 61.69.210.204 (talk) 12:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done:. This is already covered by the article in its current state. Also, keep in mind that these requests should mention a specific change you want made. (E.g. "in alinea X, I want Y changed to Z). --Licks-rocks (talk) 13:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Australia is a redundant term for Oceania, which only geographically ignorant people refer to when talking about MY continent. Australia is recognized as a country, and as you will see most reputable sites around the internet, or history books will refer to us as Oceania, not Australia. 1800's were the 1800's. It's 2024. Get with the program my friend.
If you want to call Oceania Australia, we might as well call North and South America Canada. Doesn't sound right, not sit well with anyone from the X amount of countries involved. KiwiPepega (talk) 01:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We aren't calling Oceania Australia. The continent of Australia doesn't include New Zealand or the dozens of islands of the Pacific. It includes only mainland Australia, the island of Tasmania, the island of New Guinea, and any other islands that might be on the continental shelf surrounding these. NZ and the island countries of the Pacific are not part of any continent. Unless you include Zealandia as the continent for NZ. But, as most of it is submerged, it is rarely mentioned. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 12:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The term Australia as a continent is outdated in modern geography and even in conversation... Historically Australia referred only to the landmass itself and some surrounding islands like you said.
Oceania includes not only Australia and New Guinea but also New Zealand, Micronesia, Polynesia, and Melanesiaas well as the vast number of Pacific islands. This is about recognizing that the Pacific islands, New Zealand, and other territories.
You're basically saying New Zealand and the Pacific islands are not part of any continent, or to include them under Australia, is pretty ignorant with the geographic realities of 2024. The term Oceania reflects these modern reality we live in. Australia part of this, it's not the only country and/or landmass. Geographic terms evolve and the use of'Oceania is much more accepted by all of us here than simply referring to Australia as the continent which is, extremely dated. Most modernized websites will call us Oceania, including and not limited to major gaming companies, Steam, Facebook surveys list us as Oceania, heck even https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oceania has got it right with that it's generally considered THE continent, as anyone I know both here in NZ and Australian friends say the same thing. KiwiPepega (talk) 13:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"major gaming companies, Steam, Facebook surveys" Am I really supposed to be impressed by these? --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 13:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not on it's own merits, and it's not about what "Khajidha" is impressed about either, it's about what it is, and that is the continent in which my people, and my neighbouring countries people refer to THEIR continent as. It's akin to me calling Mexico any country in NA or SA, or England as Europe. Pretty stupid right?
They were included to give what is called a broader reference, comparing peas and elephants, HUGE difference between the two but hey, if they sing the same similarities it must be so.
Australia is a country and unless you are living under a rock in Gibraltar (that's a British territory if you don't know). Even your American (I assume with the arguments your putting up), your visa office calls us Oceania. Everything that is modern, does so. We are living in 2024, not 1924.
You are referring to tectonic plates, not what is considered a modern day continent. If not, then the world should recognize Zealandia as stupid as that sounds, since no country is not part of a continent which is what you are trying to say here. I'm pretty sure my country with all it's glory is very much alive and well, as are all the others apparently non existent according to what you consider a continent, from 1924. KiwiPepega (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1) "You are referring to tectonic plates, not what is considered a modern day continent". Citation needed. 2) "no country is not part of a continent". Citation needed. 3) The US State Department divides the world into regions, not continents. NZ is in the "East Asia and the Pacific" region. See: https://www.state.gov/countries-and-areas-list/ --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 14:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 May 2024

Change " and also in Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Pakistan, the Philippines, Suriname, parts of Europe and Africa." to " and also in Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, the Philippines, Suriname, parts of Europe and Africa."

See e.g., https://www2.nhk.or.jp/school/watch/clip/?das_id=D0005310861_00000 https://www.jamstec.go.jp/sp2/column/05/ N7soc (talk) 19:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done At least in the physical book I own were reliable. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is India not a continent?

Why is Europe a continent while India is not? Europe and Asia are parts of the same tectonic plate. There are no major geographical barriers between Europe amd Asia. On the other hand, India has its own tectonic plate and is totally separate from the Eurasian mainland by significant geographical barriers.

It is time for the world to rewrite its geography books. The seven continents on Earth should be: Africa, Antarctica, Australia, Eurasia, India, North America, and South America. 120.16.165.48 (talk) 00:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree with you (except id also add the middle east) wikipedia isn't the right place to reccomend changing how we teach geography. Gaismagorm (talk) 00:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are no significant geographical barriers separating the Middle East from the Eurasian mainland. 120.16.99.77 (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah but it feels right. i mean, there also arent seperating europe from asia, but the cultural difference is large enough, and the middle east has a significant culture difference Gaismagorm (talk) 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, in terms of cultural geography, India, China, the Middle East, and Europe should all be their own continents. 120.16.99.77 (talk) 13:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A continent is a physical geographic concept. China, the Middle East, and Europe can all be major cultural geography regions, but to call those "continents" is just blatantly wrong and stupid. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 15:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is not. The word "continent" is a cultural concept. Europe is a cultural region. There are no major geographical barriers between Europe and Asia, why are they considered separate continents? Why is India not consider a continent? Why is Greenland not considered a continent? The point is, if we divide the world into cultural regions, then India, China, the Middle East, Latin America, and the Pacific Islands can all be their own continents. 120.16.99.77 (talk) 00:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly so, but Wikipedia is not the forum to argue for such a change, Wikipedia reflects the consensus among external sources. CMD (talk) 01:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zealandia

Zealandia Is The 8th Continent So Why Is It Not On Here????? 2601:98B:8203:AC40:51BA:5871:7E2D:28DE (talk) 22:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zealandia is a mostly submerged chunk of continental crust, its exposed portion is relatively small. To consider it a continent in the mainstream meaning of that term stretches the concept to, and probably beyond, its limits. However, Zealandia is mentioned in the article in the sections on submerged continents, geological continents, and microcontinents/continental fragments. This seems to be an appropriate level of inclusion of the topic. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 12:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
COMMENT Zealandia is a physical continent. A physical continent is a large piece of unbroken continental crust, including both its exposed and submerged parts (i.e. the ocean is ignored). A physical continent is a true continent, it should be larger than Greenland, the world's largest island.
There are only four such true continents on Earth:
  1. Africa-Eurasia-America
  2. Antarctica
  3. Australia-New Guinea
  4. Zealandia
However, these true continents have not been recognized by the mainstream society. The mainstream society prefers to divide the world into seven major parts (regions) based on various and sometimes confusing criteria and named them the "continents". 120.16.66.177 (talk) 08:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this distinction between the cultural and the geological definition should be described in the page. The geological definition of a continent has four criteria: high elevation relative to the ocean floor, a wide range of igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks rich in silica, acrust thicker than the surrounding oceanic crust and finally Well-defined limits around a large enough area Suturn (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 August 2024

Change Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Antarctica, Europe, and Australia to Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Antarctica, Europe, and Oceania 67.167.255.119 (talk) 02:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: See explanation in article. CMD (talk) 02:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3 continents?

After discussing a possible geophysical definition of continents via their underlying continental shelves, there is the following unsourced sentence: "In this sense the islands of Great Britain and Ireland are part of Europe, while Australia and the island of New Guinea together form a continent." I am tempted to add: this would also effectively make most of the land on earth part of one continent, since Asia and North America share a continuous continental shelf across and around the Bering Sea; only Antarctica and Australia-New Guinea have separate continental shelves larger than that of Greenland, while other continental shelves (e.g., New Zealand) are much smaller, so if we retain the standard that the relevant landmasses be larger than Greenland, there would only be three continents.

I fear this would be independent research; but the quoted sentence also seems to be an unsourced claim (though a highly reasonable inference which illustrates the suggestion from the previous sourced sentence). My suggested addition would further illustrate the vagaries and indeterminacies of continent definitions, but I'm not sure how important that is, so I just throw it out here for discussion.ScottForschler (talk) 18:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article references academic arguments that there are three or even just one continent, so you could reference that article as a source. (It is also used as a source in the Wikipedia article, in fact.) Mipadi (talk) 19:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]