Jump to content

Binary matroid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 00:12, 9 November 2024 (Added isbn. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Category:Matroid theory | #UCB_Category 7/66). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

In matroid theory, a binary matroid is a matroid that can be represented over the finite field GF(2).[1] That is, up to isomorphism, they are the matroids whose elements are the columns of a (0,1)-matrix and whose sets of elements are independent if and only if the corresponding columns are linearly independent in GF(2).

Alternative characterizations

[edit]

A matroid is binary if and only if

  • It is the matroid defined from a symmetric (0,1)-matrix.[2]
  • For every set of circuits of the matroid, the symmetric difference of the circuits in can be represented as a disjoint union of circuits.[3][4]
  • For every pair of circuits of the matroid, their symmetric difference contains another circuit.[4]
  • For every pair where is a circuit of and is a circuit of the dual matroid of , is an even number.[4][5]
  • For every pair where is a basis of and is a circuit of , is the symmetric difference of the fundamental circuits induced in by the elements of .[4][5]
  • No matroid minor of is the uniform matroid , the four-point line.[6][7][8]
  • In the geometric lattice associated to the matroid, every interval of height two has at most five elements.[8]
[edit]

Every regular matroid, and every graphic matroid, is binary.[5] A binary matroid is regular if and only if it does not contain the Fano plane (a seven-element non-regular binary matroid) or its dual as a minor.[9] A binary matroid is graphic if and only if its minors do not include the dual of the graphic matroid of nor of .[10] If every circuit of a binary matroid has odd cardinality, then its circuits must all be disjoint from each other; in this case, it may be represented as the graphic matroid of a cactus graph.[5]

Additional properties

[edit]

If is a binary matroid, then so is its dual, and so is every minor of .[5] Additionally, the direct sum of binary matroids is binary.

Harary & Welsh (1969) define a bipartite matroid to be a matroid in which every circuit has even cardinality, and an Eulerian matroid to be a matroid in which the elements can be partitioned into disjoint circuits. Within the class of graphic matroids, these two properties describe the matroids of bipartite graphs and Eulerian graphs (not-necessarily-connected graphs in which all vertices have even degree), respectively. For planar graphs (and therefore also for the graphic matroids of planar graphs) these two properties are dual: a planar graph or its matroid is bipartite if and only if its dual is Eulerian. The same is true for binary matroids. However, there exist non-binary matroids for which this duality breaks down.[5][11]

Any algorithm that tests whether a given matroid is binary, given access to the matroid via an independence oracle, must perform an exponential number of oracle queries, and therefore cannot take polynomial time.[12]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Welsh, D. J. A. (2010) [1976], "10. Binary Matroids", Matroid Theory, Courier Dover Publications, pp. 161–182, ISBN 9780486474397.
  2. ^ Jaeger, F. (1983), "Symmetric representations of binary matroids", Combinatorial mathematics (Marseille-Luminy, 1981), North-Holland Math. Stud., vol. 75, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 371–376, MR 0841317.
  3. ^ Whitney, Hassler (1935), "On the abstract properties of linear dependence", American Journal of Mathematics, 57 (3), The Johns Hopkins University Press: 509–533, doi:10.2307/2371182, hdl:10338.dmlcz/100694, JSTOR 2371182, MR 1507091.
  4. ^ a b c d Welsh (2010), Theorem 10.1.3, p. 162.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Harary, Frank; Welsh, Dominic (1969), "Matroids versus graphs", The Many Facets of Graph Theory (Proc. Conf., Western Mich. Univ., Kalamazoo, Mich., 1968), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 110, Berlin: Springer, pp. 155–170, doi:10.1007/BFb0060114, ISBN 978-3-540-04629-5, MR 0263666.
  6. ^ Tutte, W. T. (1958), "A homotopy theorem for matroids. I, II", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 88 (1): 144–174, doi:10.2307/1993244, JSTOR 1993244, MR 0101526.
  7. ^ Tutte, W. T. (1965), "Lectures on matroids", Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 69B: 1–47, doi:10.6028/jres.069b.001, MR 0179781.
  8. ^ a b Welsh (2010), Section 10.2, "An excluded minor criterion for a matroid to be binary", pp. 167–169.
  9. ^ Welsh (2010), Theorem 10.4.1, p. 175.
  10. ^ Welsh (2010), Theorem 10.5.1, p. 176.
  11. ^ Welsh, D. J. A. (1969), "Euler and bipartite matroids", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, 6 (4): 375–377, doi:10.1016/s0021-9800(69)80033-5, MR 0237368/
  12. ^ Seymour, P. D. (1981), "Recognizing graphic matroids", Combinatorica, 1 (1): 75–78, doi:10.1007/BF02579179, MR 0602418, S2CID 35579707.