Talk:Mecanum wheel

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Sweden

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

That AndyMark link is practically an advertisement. I tried to make the description an actual description, but I'm not sure the link should be there in the first place. Ichibani 22:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which Panama City

Does this article refer to Panama City, Florida or Panama City, Panama? Panama City, Panama seems like an odd place for US Navy research to take place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.207.99 (talk) 23:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Panama City also has Naval Support Activity Panama City, which often does research for the US Navy. So it would make more sense being Panama City, Florida. Xphalanxia (talk) 11:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft pallet lifts and cargo deck

I'm surprised that there is no mention at all for the most frequent use of this kind of wheel, you can see it operating in any airport handling the cargo pallets with passenger suitcases and, I believe, are also in the deck of the plane's cargo space (because I'm not sure about that, I am writing this in the Discussion page). Pallets can be seen moving in any direction and even turning 180 degrees on the very top of the platform, where they barely fit, to make them enter the cargo space the right way in. DevaSatyam (talk) 11:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Those aren't mecanum wheels. Those are omniwheels129.10.88.73 (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was a brief glimpse of a forklift with the Mecanum wheels in the recent (2009) Star Trek movie assisting with loading of stores onto/in the starship. Idyllic press (talk) 22:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check out this patent http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6622846.pdf It might be trademarked as "HeliRoll", e.g. http://directory.groundsupportworldwide.com/product/10027512/JBT_AeroTech_HeliRoll_Transfer_Decks Here's a video of one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI2onMzb1nk#t=1m50s This video for replacement rollers shows it off pretty good http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2RwYaTu1Zw#t=0m54s http://www.esroll.com/ Fxm12 (talk) 05:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this (patent) dead yet?

I'm confused. Why would any corporation pay the US Navy, in 1997, for the rights to build this technology when the patent should have expired in 1992? Or even 1993-1995 if you're generous and giving it the 20 year span of a current patent? 67.207.228.58 (talk) 04:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like they bought a copy of the drawings from the Navy archive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.237.208.127 (talk) 06:05, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wheelchair

I have seen the wheelchair in the late 1990s in China. But can't remember the manufacturer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.78.75.150 (talk) 11:26, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]