User talk:Omegatron
| Wikipedia:Babel | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Search user languages |
|
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 30 days will be automatically moved to this month's archive. Other months can be accessed from my list of archives. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
missing "key" footnote?
Hi Omegatron! I noticed in this edit you added an empty footnote ({{efn|name=key}}). Is there text you wanted in the footnote? Otherwise, we should remove the empty template. = paul2520 💬 21:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- No, just copied it from Nationwide opinion polling for the 2024 Republican Party presidential primaries#Favorability polling by accident. — Omegatron (talk) 21:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Equal Vote Coalition
Please note that poorly targeted redirect is explicitly covered by WP:NOTCSD point 15, as such please reverse this deletion and list the page at WP:RFD, thank you. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:D57A:272A:CCA5:982A (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirects
On your user/talk pages on enWS, the redirects don't work because of the parentheses, you have to remove them for it to work. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 12:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
Hi Omegatron. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Social_utility_efficiency for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social_utility_efficiency, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social utility efficiency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- User:Affinepplan, why not spend your time creating content instead of destroying it? 😑 — Omegatron (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- please see WP:Content removal
- the deletion of unsourced, inaccurate, POV, or in this case irrelevant content is a productive contribution to Wikipedia just as creation is. Affinepplan (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- How are concepts from social choice theory not relevant to include in an encyclopedia? — Omegatron (talk) 16:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- please read WP:Notability. the only reliable source discussing this metric in detail is a single publication by the progenitor from several decades ago. Affinepplan (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- How are concepts from social choice theory not relevant to include in an encyclopedia? — Omegatron (talk) 16:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- That's obviously not true; there are numerous references in academic literature. What's your motivation for trying to delete this? — Omegatron (talk) 03:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- > there are numerous references in academic literature
- there are not. Affinepplan (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- That's obviously not true; there are numerous references in academic literature. What's your motivation for trying to delete this? — Omegatron (talk) 03:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes there are plenty for notability; I've added a list to the AfD. Why are you trying to delete this? — Omegatron (talk) 00:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- please see my response to that list.
- > Why are you trying to delete this?
- because it fails WP:Notability Affinepplan (talk) 00:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes there are plenty for notability; I've added a list to the AfD. Why are you trying to delete this? — Omegatron (talk) 00:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,