Talk:The Wombats

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merseyside Mid‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Festivals?

Is it really necessary to list all the festivals that they've played at?78.105.233.220 (talk) 18:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, maybe just include a few of the biggest festivals if anything at all 90.194.131.130 (talk) 14:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indie Pop???

Indie rock is a better defining genre'S due to the fact Let's Dance To Joy Division sounds a heck a lot more like an indie rock song. Thundermaster367 11:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have all of their music so far. It falls between indie pop and indie rock in my opinion, so add rock and keep both if you wish. Operating 11:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...and elements of pop punk too. Thundermaster^TRUC 11:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They're signed to a subsidiary of Warner Records. Therefore they're not Indie at all. --82.47.121.108 (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indie has NOTHING to do with whether the band is truly independent. It's a style that was pioneered by bands that were once independent. 121.72.167.71 (talk) 08:44, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh man you are so wrong it's upsetting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.233.220 (talk) 18:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And who are probably spinning in their yet-to-be-filled graves at how the meaning has been bastardised by dull musicians. Tony2Times (talk) 00:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried adding "Utter Crap" to their list of genres. It got reverted, even though it is a much better description than "indie pop." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.252.46 (talk) 02:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Their record label is a sub-label from Warner, and it is indie. And calling them indie also refers to the music style, as mentioned beforehand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.12.182.182 (talk) 00:59, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Stewart

I'm pretty sure that he's in the band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.94.173.141 (talk) 21:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No^{[citation needed]} --Rodhull andemu 21:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. See WP:PROVEIT. Meanwhile this disruption is both boring and tiresome. <scouse>"I don't like dickheads"</scouse>. --Rodhull andemu 22:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second Album

Does anyone else agree that the current section on the new album seems like it comes from band PR? Lots of positive comments about the style and very little actual information such as a release date. Have added a citation template to the section, if no interviews or press releases can be cited I suggest the section just list the name of the album and its expected release date until the album actually comes out. M1ke (talk) 10:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An Actual Wombat picture

Why is there a picture of an actual Wombat..? ISeriouslyNeedALife (talk) 23:31, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because some dickhead thinks it's amusing. It isn't, and I've removed it. Rodhull andemu 23:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Professional Review

I write for a website, American Music Channel, that constantly publishes reviews for different albums, This Modern Glitch being a recent one. I was wondering if any of the editors would be able to publish our rating to the professional review section. Here is the link: http://americanmusicchannel.com/features/reviews/5-5-2011/modern-glitch . Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mphox2 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Wombats @ Lovebox.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:The Wombats @ Lovebox.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 8 October 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]