Talk:Delhi-6

India: Cinema Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Fancuft, poor writing, many policy/guideline violations

Legolas, as he has done before, insists on inserting fan-level writing that reads as if it were written by a high-school student. "Little does he know that the quick trip will turn into the longest journey of his life - a journey within" -- that is the worst sort of unencyclopedic WP:TONE violation. He puts in rumors and gossip and, in another major bit of poor and weaselly writing, the vague, passive voice "it was reported" construction. There are anonymous blog posts as sources (such as this inexcusable one) and other WP:RS violations as well. Additionally, his edit summary ("general clean-up and removing bad links") was grossly and deliberately misleading. This time, I'm calling for a Request for Comment, and respectfully ask that Legolas leave the current version, which does not violate a score of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, up until we hear from others. -- 207.237.223.118 (talk) 13:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment: Delhi-6

Statements by editors involved in dispute

Statement by 207.237.223.118: The Legolas version [1] is filled with violations of WP:TONE, uses anonymous blogs for sources, contains WP:FANCRUFT and poor writing, and has other issues. -- 207.237.223.118 (talk) 13:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would additionally note that anonymous IP 220.227.179.5, who restored the disputed edits by Legolas2186 here, shows many of the very same articles in his user-contributions list as Legolas2186's user-contributions list. -- 207.237.223.118 (talk) 14:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by User:Legolas2186:

Comments by other editors

I think I see where some misunderstanding lies. Legolas2186 writes in what is a standard form in Indian-film fan magazines and Web sites — that is, in a gossipy, conversational form not really appropriate for Wikipedia. Of much more concern are the unreliable sources he cites, such as fan blogs by anonymous/pseudonymous authors, his reversion without discussion, and an edit summary that does not accurately summarize what appears to be, on a surface glance, a WP:OWN reversion. I prefer the version here [2], which is not to say individual points may not be improved upon. -- Farpointer (talk) 18:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Having been asked to comment by the IP, I can only see that their reversion is superior, more neutral and better sourced. Alientraveller (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dilli 6 or Delhi 6 on soundtrack?

While this photo on a blog repeatedly cited by an IP seems to imply a song on the soundtrack is titled Dilli-6, everyone else seems to have Delhi 6 Smashits.com, IMDB, and Amazon. He iro 08:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Delhi-6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Delhi-6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Delhi-6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classified.nsf/ClassifiedWorks/DF152B94D9F71A878025755C0043CC3C
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/delhi_6/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://movies.ndtv.com/reviews.asp?lang=Hindi&id=379&moviename=Delhi-6
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?sectionName=HomePage&id=03f8bf25-f1dd-4f7d-8406-a011b322b518&&Headline=Review%3A+EMDelhi+6%2FEM
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.indianfilmdom.com/delhi-6-audio-release-function-on-indian-idol-4-event-gallery-video
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090110193510/http://movies.indiainfo.com/2009/01/08/0901081249_dove_song_in_delhi-6_was_not_planned_rakeysh_mehra.html to http://movies.indiainfo.com/2009/01/08/0901081249_dove_song_in_delhi-6_was_not_planned_rakeysh_mehra.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Genda Phool (Badshah song) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:48, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]