User talk:Carloschilo

Welcome!

Hello, Carloschilo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 09:41, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Phiwa Nkambule - neutral point of view

Hello Carloschilo, when adding content to Wikipedia please make sure to phrase information as neutral as possible from an uninvolved observer's point of view. Also, promotional and extraordinary claims should not be based on self-published information or interview quotes. Please see WP:NPOV and WP:RS with additional information about these aspects. I have trimmed some problematic content in regard to these requirements from the article. In case you have a personal or professional connection to the topic, you should also read and follow WP:COI and clearly disclose this connection (otherwise feel free to ignore this part). I hope these tips are helpful for future edits, but please let me know if you have any further questions. I'd be glad to help. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 10:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest? (+ image copyright)

Hello Carloschilo, if you work for Phiwa Nkambule as an employee or PR representative (or are editing about yourself), you must disclose this conflict of interest per Wikipedia's guidelines and the WMF's Terms of Use. Please make sure to read WP:COI and WP:PAID, and post the necessary transparent disclosure as described in these guidelines. Also another quick tip: when you upload images that have been previously published, you should verify the copyright owner's free license via email first. Please read and follow Commons:Commons:OTRS for such mail verifications. Thank you for your consideration. I hope these tips are helpful, but please feel free to ask me or post at WP:Teahouse if you have any further Wikipedia-related questions. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Royal Science and Technology Park

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Royal Science and Technology Park, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lapablo (talk) 21:46, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Royal Science and Technology Park

The article Royal Science and Technology Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient independent in-depth sources to establish notability. The article is made by user tagged for WP:COI issues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imcdc Contact 03:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phiwa Nkambule for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phiwa Nkambule, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phiwa Nkambule (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]