User talk:DareshMohan

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prema Qaidi (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prema Qaidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh hello, and hello again, DareshMohan.... I was just passing on DareshMohan's TP to leave a Barnstar and I see this. The subject will very likely never meet WP:NALBUM and for a perfectly good reason.....because it's a film. Consider having a second look, please. On a more general note, the fact that so many articles are declined by various reviewers with boilerplate messages is terribly ....how can I put it mildly? ...sad and demoralising! Generic reasons, not even the slightest effort to be specific, seem to be the rule. It gives the impression that some reviewers barely have a look at the page. Maybe you did and maybe they do but that's not the feeling I get when I read their short and dismissive comments, to be perfectly honest with you.Thank you. Mushy Yank (talk) 23:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

@Mushy Yank: Perhaps consider how you approach people who make mistakes because I believe your comment to be far more demoralizing than a genuine mistake on my part, which I believe was based on having a number of tabs open at once and responding to the wrong one. Do you REALLY think this is the best way to approach someone about an issue? Things happen, but your attitude is what leads to a giant backlog instead of people making genuine efforts to help others. But, given your bad attitude, I suspect this will fall on deaf ears. @DareshMohan, I apologize about the mistake. I genuinely hope I have not deterred you, because I do appreciate your efforts to improve Wikipedia. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

PS, I will not be reviewing the article, I believe it's been implied I'm not competent enough to do so, so perhaps I'll take a break from reviewing drafts and helping with the backlog all together. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

PPS, I reverted my decline of the draft, and I want to again apologize about the mistake Daresh. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh A bit surprised by your message. Did I imply you were incompetent? I certainly did not mean to. And was I rude and insulting in any way? If you perceived that in my message, that was not my intent and I'm sorry. I explained the comment you had left could give the impression that you had read the page too fast (I understand that was not the case, and you probably meant FILM not ALBUM? Sure, as I said, it may be the case, and if you say so, then it is, but that's not the effect the comment has (or might have), don't you agree?) and then, and for the main part of my message, I expanded to a more general issue: the lack of specific reasons present in many comments declining subsmissions (plural, absolutely nothing personal, I don't even know you) and the impression it can give. Do you disagree with my comment? Shouldn't comments declining an article be more specific? (My "attitude"? What attitude?) Mushy Yank (talk) 00:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

@Mushy Yank: I do not review film articles, that is not my area of familiarity, and I only review the areas that I am comfortable with. It is clear as day that this is an article about a film, which is why I'm fairly confident it was an incorrect tab. You are welcome to join the AfC project to be the change you want to see or suggest changes there. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Aahuthi

Is Aahuthi a remake of Rajavinte Makan (1986)? I did not come across that information in any Telugu articles on the film. The source cited on the latter page for remakes also does not mention Aahuthi. L5boat (talk) 06:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

@Srivin: do you know? DareshMohan (talk) 17:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Looking at the climax it is clear that it was remade from that film. Srivin (talk) 12:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Cool L5boat (talk) 13:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your work and your consistent efforts to improve things. . Mushy Yank (talk) 14:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prema Qaidi (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prema Qaidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

OTTPlay

Why are you removing it from articles saying it is non RS? Where is the consensus that it is not RS? It is owned by HT Media. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

It is not RS per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#OTTPlay.com @Kailash29792: DareshMohan (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Alright. It's a tragedy then that many journalists from other reliable sources like Thinkal Menon (Times of India) shifted to this. RangersRus, your perspective? Or should we reopen this discussion? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes please reopen the discussion. RangersRus (talk) 12:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Pranaya Geetham

Alas, it's been deleted. Did you ever find additional refs? Or give up on it? Hope there's at least one review of it on the net. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Similar to Kokkaroko, it is a complete waste of time. Other than two passing mentions: [1] [2], there's nothing: [3]. @Kailash29792: DareshMohan (talk) 17:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

There’s one article on the film in Andhra Patrika before its release. L5boat (talk) 13:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Muthukumar Wanted

Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muthukumar Wanted, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Y2K (2004 film) (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pokelego999 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Y2K (2004 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 15:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Image (film)

Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Image (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Shelved project

What's the criteria for creating a page on a shelved project? Is it only about substantial coverage or anything else is also needed? I notice that some unfinished ones like Marudanayagam have articles. L5boat (talk) 06:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Not entirely sure but @Kailash29792: should know. DareshMohan (talk) 09:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Better discussed at WP:Film. As far as I know, significant sourced details surrounding production are enough. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Does Pawan Kalyan's Satyagrahi count? It had a high-profile launch and received significant media coverage, though the project was active for only a short period. L5boat (talk) 11:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Make sure filming was almost 100% complete for the film. What percentage of the film was shot? Less than 1/3=not notable.DareshMohan (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

It did not complete a great deal of filming AFAIK. But they signed all big technicians. Then probably it won’t pass notability guidelines. L5boat (talk) 18:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Ezham suryan

The film was noticed during release but ended up as a flop. The hero is now enjoying good star value. Soorya Kireedam is a different film and there is no Soorya Universe mentioned anywhere, someone just made it up, I guess.
Anish Viswa 04:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

First name: "heynaya". Who is that? [4]. @Anishviswa: DareshMohan (talk) 01:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

I think the clip is cut from the middle of some word 😂
Anish Viswa 04:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Huck Milner

Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Huck Milner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:08, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Moon Nila

Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moon Nila, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Google Listing Error

@DareshMohan I hope you are doing well, and I have created few articles and they aren't listed in Google or any Search engines! infact they are not visible on any web platforms! could you please help me with the possible reason behind this mechanism and to avoid/overcome this Thesazh (talk) 11:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Thesazh, guess it'll take time. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

@Kailash29792 Thanks for the reply, but, a few pages of mine were listed in a short period of time, but a few are still not listed yet! I was wondering, did I make any mistake/code error while publishing the article! Anyway, I'll wait though, thanks once again! 🙂 Thesazh (talk) 12:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

@Thesazh: Google sometimes doesn't create infoboxes when the article is created after the film releases and only lists the wiki page in the search results. [5] @Manick22: Samuthirakani-ku intha half-dubbed half-reshot padam panni பொழப்பா போச்சு. First, Vaathi (mostly Tamil), Vimanam (one reshot dialogue), tp Ramam Raghavam (half and half) [6]. நீ தெலுங்குல பேசு நான் தமிழா பேசுறேன். DareshMohan (talk) 20:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

😀 Khiladi Kumar [7] @Thesazh WP:Controlling search engine indexing The pages that are not indexed in Google Search will be listed once they get reviewed by a new page reviewer. [8] Manick22 (talk) 20:57, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Similar sounding songs

Title song of ETV serial Anveshitha and the song "Incharave" from Kannada film Neelambari sound slightly similar i felt. Do u think both the songs sound somewhat similar ?. Srivin (talk) 16:36, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Definitely similar, even themes of the film and TV show look the same. DareshMohan (talk) 18:38, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

@Srivin: Some reason this line [9] reminds me of this [10]. DareshMohan (talk) 22:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

somewhat similar. Srivin (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Raagas

Are Suddhadhanyasi and Sudhasaveri same? This music review notes "Jajimalli" as Sudhasaveri-based? L5boat (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

I am not in any position to confirm but looks different because they have different wiki pages. @Kailash29792: did you take paatu class, how can the recreation of one song be in a different raga? DareshMohan (talk) 19:03, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

I don't know anything about this. All I know is that Suddha Dhanyasi is closer to Udayaravichandrika. This is better asked to someone who edits Carnatic music pages. Kailash29792 (talk) 01:14, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

If we don’t have further details, I would remove the name of the raaga in the music section. L5boat (talk) 13:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

RE Articles without sources

I'm sorry, I saw your message yesterday and then got caught up in some other things and completely slipped my mind. Glad you were able to resolve it though! I think your approach was appropriate, using redirects. Ravensfire (talk) 14:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Pooja Gandhi

Hi DareshMohan, I've now finished my c/e; I decided not to remove the uncited material here because it is not negative or potentially libellous, and could probably be cited fairly easily, given the subject's apparent popularity. I have marked the section with a BLP-refimprove tag. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)