User talk:Free258

December 2024

Hello, I'm Synorem. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Boot camp (correctional) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the content I added are of neutral point of view, with numerous reference sources for verification, many of which i have cited. If you don't believe me, you can take a closer look. Thank you. Free258 (talk) 15:26, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Amigao. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 18:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there are numerous reliable sources in my article, many of which come from well-known American news companies such as CNN. Free258 (talk) 02:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Boot camp (correctional) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Amigao (talk) 17:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Amigao (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This account was set up to evade the block on User: Jeff6741. Edit warring against consensus and violations of WP:NPOV are unacceptable. Cullen328 (talk) 18:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not a puppet at all. I have nothing to do with Jeff6741 and I don't know him either. However, after reviewing his previous contributions, I believe that everything he wrote is true. Through continuous searching for information, I have proven this fact. Free258 (talk) 07:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]