Draft talk:Dipak Giri

Regarding Disclaimer "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject"

Kindly help me how to remove the tag "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." This tag is suggesting a clean up but not clarifying what to be cleaned up. Kindly guide me in this connection. Rohit1976 (talk) 17:43, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

@Rohit1976: The tag is suggesting that the major contributor (you) may not be impartial. Please see WP:COI. You should declare your conflict on your user page. Other editors should review and fix the draft. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

I wish to know where have you found the ground of partiality. The entire article is prepared with valid references available on internet. Still if you think there is any information that seems to you to be partial, you should guide me. My brain is not working to detect partiality. I have gone through several times and also trying to bring clean up, if there's anything wrong. You have tagged this one so you know where problem is. Kindly guide me instead of giving me direction to go somewhere. I hope you'll comply with my earnest request. I hope you'll reply and guide me in the process. Thanks and regards Rohit1976 (talk) 20:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

I'm not saying there is a lack of impartiality. I'm saying because you have a COI, there may be a lack of impartiality. Your COI would prevent you from seeing it. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:36, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Kindly remove this tag if you have just doubt of partiality. I have tried to remove it but it's not working and it has again appeared. I hope you'll remove this tag and make me free from worry. Thanks and regards Rohit1976 (talk) 21:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

That is not how this works. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:22, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Rohit1976, I have some questions for you. a) Do you have any personal connection to Dipak Giri? b) Have you been approached or requested by anyone to create or edit a Wikipedia article about Dipak Giri? c) Are you affiliated with Dipak Giri in any capacity, such as a friend, relative, or employee? TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

The answers of your questions are as follows:

a) I don't have any personal connection with Dipak Giri. I know him by his works which are associated with social welfare that has appealed me as much as that I'm here to create or edit a Wikipedia article about him and his works.

b) No one has approached or requested me to create or edit a Wikipedia article about Dipak Giri. It's works of Dipak Giri that I think may appeal anyone like me. I have come to know about him with his contributions to literature and society through his works and my interest in him has brought me here.

c) No, I'm not affiliated with Dipak Giri in any capacity, such as a friend, relative, or employee. However, I'm a great fan of his works. Through his works, I think like many others who have read his works closely, Dipak Giri has taken a much-needed effort to eradicate many social problems in relevance to our modern society.

I hope you will be satisfied with my answers and guide me to go forward with my article.

Thanks and regards Rohit1976 (talk) 09:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

@Rohit1976: Could you clarify how File:Dipak Giri.jpg qualifies as your own work if you have no personal connection with him? TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This jpg was once uploaded by me and this one was collected from one of my friends who is also one of Dipak Giri's fans. I might have upload any of images available on internet but I did not because it might give the problem of copyright infringement in future. Rohit1976 (talk) 10:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

I used this photo at that time because I was ascertained by my friend that it was nowhere published. If this photo is at the root of all problems, I'll remove this photo. I need guidance. Rohit1976 (talk) 10:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Will I remove this photo? Rohit1976 (talk) 10:31, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

@Rohit1976: I need a detailed and honest explanation please. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

When I was on my way of preparing this article, I felt the need of a photo for this article. The content of this article undoubtedly bore my own originality with valid support of references available to me at that time but sorry to say, at that time I faced a problem as regards photo, though I found many photos of Dipak Giri while googling but no image was free from copyright. I thought the article would look better if I insert an image but my problem was how to find an image, free from copyright. Then I contacted some of my friends who also read works of Dipak Giri like me. I hoped they might have photo of Dipak Giri, free from copyright but I was disappointed because they also suggested me to use photo available on internet. However, after trying long, one of my friends shared this photo but now I'm sorry to learn that this photo is creating problem in my article. For me, content of this article is more important than photo. I'll remove this photo if you suggest me to do so. I need further guidance. Thanks and regards Rohit1976 (talk) 13:39, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Ok fine! Now let's take a moment to evaluate the sources. Notability is established by reliable, independent, secondary sources. Sources that are closely associated with the subject—such as self-published works, links to book publishing houses, low-quality journals, articles influenced or edited by the subject, or book database websites—are generally considered unreliable. Also, interviews, while potentially informative, are typically seen as primary sources and do not contribute to establishing notability on their own. Unfortunately, the current draft leans heavily on these types of sources, which do not sufficiently meet the notability criteria under WP:AUTHOR and WP:ANYBIO. It lacks general notability guidelines. To be more specific, add only three good source than adding 27 sources. Notability requires quality sources, not just quantity. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

I hope now you have no issue with COI. I have clarified why I have kept this photo in this article. Kindly help me removing this tag. As regards guidelines of notability, I'll decrease the number of citations and add only those sources which are comparatively better than the rest. I'll reexamine this article as per your requirement and then revise and resubmit. But what about this photo which has given rise the problem of COI. Kindly guide me in this connection also. Thanks for your valuable support and guidance. Regards Rohit1976 (talk) 15:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)