Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of BBC Radio 4 programmes#Sitcoms. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Double Science

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable radio show; lacks any significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. Only refs found in Google are mere mentions or are BBC links, which is not independent of subject. -- Wikipedical (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: all kinds of hits on the phrase, nothing found for a radio program. Lack of sourcing. What's now in the article for sourcing isn't helpful Oaktree b (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This was all I could find [1], still not a RS. Oaktree b (talk) 02:08, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List_of_BBC_Radio_4_programmes#Sitcoms: listed there (merge whatever content can be merged). (FWIW, I had indicated a Redirect should be considered when I DPD the page (same nominator)) -Mushy Yank. 21:34, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found enough sourcing to prove that the subject exists but not enough to prove notability. It merits acknowledging that the title seems to bring up false positives. Low signal to noise ratio. Someone with more knowledge of the show or its context might have better results. Darkfrog24 (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.