Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LaffyTaffer (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Both disrupting editors, indef as NOTHERE. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- IPs were also contributing to the disruption and continue to do so. LaffyTaffer (talk) 04:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing darts event subject to repetitive vandalism including many edits against consensus. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 20:28, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. It's one IP. How can they know they're doing wrong if you don't tell them? Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Couple IP address trying to add unsources Juan Soto didn't re–signed with the Yankees he signed with the Mets so is unsources by couple IP address. 148.76.226.154 (talk) 04:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
If other IP address continued to add unsources adding re–signed with the Yankees which is not true, Juan Soto did signed with the Mets then I will request Indefinitely protection for now I will try to request Temporary protection. 148.76.226.154 (talk) 05:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I want protection in myself. Panda Arun (talk) 09:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Citation provided by a 'National Endowment for Democracy'-approved source is being rejected, and, 'consideration' of illegality is not 'confirmation' of illegality - due process must be followed instead of spurious allegations ? Sebforbes (talk) 09:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)