Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Delhi

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Delhi. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Delhi|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Delhi. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to India.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Delhi/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Articles for deletion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay Sehgal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed the PROD tag from this article since it was already PRODed once. Page was also speedy deleted under WP:G11 twice before, and subject appears to be non-notable.

The editor who added the PROD tag provided the following rationale:

Clearly fails WP:GNG/WP:NBIO. Quick run-down of the five existing refs: Ref 1 is openly sponsored content, ref 2 is a Q&A/interview with the subject, ref 3 is a post by the subject, ref 4 is is a Q&A/interview with the subject (accompanied by a short bio/introduction), and ref 5 is a press release, presumably by the subject or one of their companies (although it's not transparently indicated that it's a PR on the website, the text, which can be found on a few other "news" websites, follows a PR template for this kind of "news", see, e.g., basically the same release for another person and another one). All other sources I see are also either primary (interviews etc.) or non-independent. The subject seems to have received some awards/honors but none of them are notable afaics (like the kind of award/honor mentioned in ref 2) (proposed by Felida97).

CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris: Thank you for fixing my mistake! Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 22:30, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and United States of America. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as noted elsewhere, unreliable press releases and infomercials have taken over previously responsible media there, so sourcing about business in India just verifies existence, but does not constitute significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 18:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it's about a businessman who both exists and does his job, with no indication of this meeting notability per WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Wikishovel (talk) 19:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per the nomination. Taabii (talk) 20:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There's also an existing draft for this subject, Draft:Sanjay Sehgal, which has been declined a few times by now. While there's more text (the text/sentences currently in the article is/are a subset of the text/sentences in the draft) and a few other refs in the draft, it doesn't contain anything that changes my assessment. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 22:30, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO or WP:GNG. 190.219.101.225 (talk) 07:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay Passi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see any significant coverage. Likely doesn't pass WP:GNG. LKBT (talk) 05:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, India, and Delhi. LKBT (talk) 05:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: GNG is definitely met. Even though a lot of his fame comes from his wife, who's an internet sensation for her luxury lifestyle and appearance on a popular reality show and Netflix series, he's made a name for himself too. WP:SIGCOV have been identified from sources like Economic Times, Motor India Online india.com, DNAIndia, Hauterfly, Times Now, Hindustan Times.--— MimsMENTOR ^talk 15:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This nominator appears to be a WP:SPA, unfamiliar to criteria's. Initiated a new AfD for Shalini Passi just days after the previous AfD was closed, reopening the discussion only 4 days later. The user's Afd history reflects a pattern of similar behaviour.— MimsMENTOR ^talk 15:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm leaning procedural keep, despite being poorly sourced. AfD was badly abused in c. 2007-2014, when someone would nominate an article hours after a closed nomination. Then they would canvas their friends. Bearian (talk) 22:02, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mark me as weak keep. Bearian (talk) 15:45, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) — MimsMENTOR ^talk 20:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shalini Passi

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to see enough SIGCOV to meet WP:NARTIST, WP:GNG or WP:ACTOR. LKBT (talk) 07:49, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, Women, India, and Delhi. LKBT (talk) 07:49, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This nomination is a case of WP:6MONTHS. The previous nomination was closed just four days ago (on 11/12) with a consensus to "Keep."--— MimsMENTOR ^talk 13:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naved Aslam

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Unsourced BLP. No indication of significance. Fails WP:SIGCOV scope_creep^Talk 14:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Shellwood (talk) 16:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Delhi and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a reference so it's not unreferenced, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The subject has worked in numerous movies and has also been part of multiple television shows. Previously, the article relied on a single source, but I have now added several new sources to improve its credibility. The subject clearly meets the criteria outlined in WP:ENT. Baqi:) (talk) 12:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As it stands now there clearly is not a consensus for any course of action. Hopefulyy another week will remedy that.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 01:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A notable actor, active since 90s, worked in multiple notable filmd and Tv Shows, passes WP:NACTOR. Zuck28 (talk) 22:36, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.