Jump to content

Talk:Lynn Williams (soccer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by CommunityNotesContributor (talk | contribs) at 16:48, 26 December 2024 (b class). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Requested move 30 March 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 03:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


– Appears to be primary topic per all-time page views, nearest competitor Lynn "Red" Williams is a redirect. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 02:58, 30 March 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Steel1943 (talk) 03:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(The following discussion thread was initiated at WP:RMTR.) Steel1943 (talk) 03:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hameltion: I'm contesting this since it needs to go to full discussion since you are requesting the article be moved for a reason that is not technical in nature (WP:PRIMARYTOPIC). In addition, Lynn Williams would need to be moved to Lynn Williams (disambiguation), which is not part of this request (which makes sense since only one page can be requested to be moved in the template). However, I'm unable (or, should I say, "unallowed") to create the discussion since you marked "discuss=no". Do you want this to go to full discussion, or would you rather remove the request? Steel1943 (talk) 03:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Steel1943: Already did the disambiguation move, was trying boldly to do a pair of PRIMARYTOPIC moves. Discussion is OK, but I figured this was pretty clear cut. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hameltion: Possibly, but there could be someone with a dissenting view who could have valid input to provide via such a move discussion. Well, since moving to discussion has your permission, I'll get that started here in a bit. Steel1943 (talk) 03:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hameltion: Discussion opened. Steel1943 (talk) 03:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Steel1943, you are way faster than me - I was writing out an appeal to WP:BOLD and WP:IAR just to make the move now, but I guess a discussion is fine haha. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hameltion: Yeah, I'm a bit of a speedster when it comes to this stuff ... even fixed the external link issue that breaks the RM template when it gets substituted. (No idea why that happens, and hopefully someone fixes it some day.) Steel1943 (talk) 03:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.