Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Delhi

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Delhi. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Delhi|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Delhi. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to India.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Delhi/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Articles for deletion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 21:58, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vivek Bharti Sharma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article on Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma lacks verifiable notability, with only two references supporting extensive claims. A quick search reveals no significant independent coverage or landmark achievements, failing Wikipedia’s notability and verifiability standards for judicial figures. Kriji Sehamati (talk) 13:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and India. Shellwood (talk) 15:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: meets WP:NJUDGE. GNG does not need to be met. C F A 16:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep He does appear to meet the WP:NJUDGE requirements provided sources exist that support the article text. I have reviewed one of the two sources and it supports some but not all of the clams in the article text. Simonm223 (talk) 17:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Delhi and Uttarakhand. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to meet WP:NJUDGE to me.Sophisticatedevening]] (talk) 20:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
:Honestly the AfDs are a mixed bag - I have weighed in on two of them one as (weak) keep and the other as delete. I would suggest that we should be deciding these AfDs on their merits and not on whatever muck gets raked up on the drama board. Simonm223 (talk) 20:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah you're right just thought it was something to consider.Sophisticatedevening (talk) 20:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The page meets the criteria under both WP:NJUDGE and the WP:GNG. The article is supported by significant coverage. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Arguments are made to keep, and the nomination is invalid on its face as it was made by a now CU-confirmed sock account El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 21:53, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pawan Reley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as it lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Many references cited in the article are either promotional or lack credibility. Citations 13, 14, and 15 are press releases, which are inherently self-promotional and do not establish notability. Additionally, citations 16 and 17 are from Amazon, a platform unsuitable for verifying the significance of an individual's achievements. The article also appears promotional in tone, emphasizing awards and achievements without adequate independent verification. A neutral point of view is essential on Wikipedia, and the content here violates this principle. Furthermore, a preliminary Google search fails to uncover substantial, independent coverage of Pawan Reley, further undermining claims of notability. Without credible, independent sources to substantiate the subject's achievements and influence, this article fails to demonstrate that the individual meets the notability requirements for inclusion on Wikipedia. Kriji Sehamati (talk) 14:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and India. Shellwood (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Delhi, Karnataka, and Madhya Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This page meet the criteria under both WP:NJUDGE and the WP:GNG. The article is supported by significant coverage from reliable, independent sources that demonstrate the subject’s notability within the legal field. The inclusion of verifiable information about their legal career, achievements and books further supports their notability. As such, the article fulfills the requirements for both notability guidelines. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info I wanted to clarify that I have added references related to the book mentioned in the article, including links to where the book is actually available. It is important to include such book references as they provide verifiable sources for the information. The source from Amazon is valid for verifying the book’s availability, and it helps to substantiate the claims made in the article. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Improve your English mate 2A00:23C5:C05E:EC00:F4C0:EA5C:FA3A:BE07 (talk) 21:37, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure! But i believe my writing meets the standards of clarity and understanding WP:NONENG. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Thanks to recent improvements.--Ipigott (talk) 16:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Books on the Delhi Metro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This non-profit organization fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: agree with reasons Asteramellus (talk) 22:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biba Apparels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Fashion, and Delhi. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]