Acts of Andrew
 | This article or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This article was last edited by 81.156.177.21 (talk | contribs) 19 years ago. (Update timer) |
The Acts of Andrew, from the New Testament apocrypha, is most likely a 3rd century work. However, it is widely thought to have been based on an earlier early 2nd century version, since it is silent about Jesus as an historical figure, doesn't mention church liturgy or ritual, and seems unaware of potential criticism of its theology by any other writers. There is an early fragment in Coptic, but such fragments have been edited from Greek originals.
Eusebius of Caesarea knew the work, which he dismissed as the production of a heretic and absurd. The Acts of Andrew is often classed as a gnostic work, but one of the principle academics in the field, Geoff Trowbridge, asserts that it stresses the importance of martyrdom throughout, which is very inconsistent with gnostic thought.
The text is thought to have been based on the Acts of John and the Acts of Peter, and quite a few academics have proposed that they may have been written by the same author. Like these works, the text chronicles the purported travels of the apostle, and miracles he is said to have caused, and ends in an account of his death.
 | This Christianity-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |