User talk:Humblefool/Archive 2
User talk:Humblefool/Archive 2/ArchivePlease be civil, and know that I will respond soon-ish to you on your own talk page. I don't delete stuff, even flames or spam, I just archive.
Ah, yes
As a dedicated Meditator, I will meditate on your request. Andre (talk) 02:54, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
Arbitration Committee case opening
The Arbitration Committee has accepted the case against Iasson. Please bring evidence to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Iasson/Evidence. Thank you. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 04:06, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)
I just learned about you and feel badly about leaving you out of this family outing. ;-) hydnjo talk 00:37, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Oops - I was only making joke (I thought). Let me explain. Onefool's account was started by Wonderfool on a whim which he thought would be an extention of his own wordplay (wonderful/wonderfool) username. When I noticed Onefool's account I posted the section noted above to include a fair number of other potential usernames using the same wordplay that is, taking a common word ending with ful and substituting fool. Thus User:Beautiful would become User:Beautifool. Anyway when I came across your name, Humblefool, I was reminded of that whimsical but fictitious User:Onefool and thought that you might get a chuckle out of it so I posted the above. I'm sorry if you were disrurbed as I intended no harm.
- Good luck with your arbitration case with User:Iasson. And,by the way, what does "Shwa" mean? hydnjo talk 18:12, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Doubletake
Saw your name and did a doubletake. Do The Humble Guys ring a bell with you? · Katefan0(scribble) 02:59, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC) That's a shame! I knew all those guys way back when, including Humblefool (before the Internet really -- the age of local bulletin boards). Cheers anyway! · Katefan0(scribble) 03:13, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
You might this VfD for this article interesting.
Klonimus 00:47, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Guardian Angels
I have made deletions to what I consider libelous, unfounded accusations about the Guardian Angels. You should be asking the contributors of the original material to provide you with sources and evidence to substantiate their accusations. As far as I'm concerned, the burden of proof should be with the person throwing around stupid claims versus someone who deletes them. I am a Guardian Angels in Reno, Nevada, and you can call me and verify this by going to www.guardianangels.org or just call any Guardian Angel on that list.
Slamming
I'd really like to know what you would do if some idiot edited your page with something like "This fool is some neo-Nazi Yakuza clan member who loves Bush and Cheney." Then you delete it, and some guy comes along and puts it back and tells you to prove that you're not some neo-Nazi Yakuza. Wikipedia is becoming a joke.