User talk:Xcentaur/Archive 7
Eh
- └Jared┘┌talk┐
- Jimbo did right
- Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2007 - rm redlinks to nn participants
- Serbian comics - need to correct wording
- Things Happen for a Reason - should the track performance be on the album page itself?
Configurational Bias
There are three configurations of a transistor. Configuration is the method of connecting any one terminal of transistor common to both input and output circuits. The three types are listed below.
1. Common base (Grounded base) (CB)
- Here base is common to both input and output. Emitter-base jn is fwd-biased and collector-base jn is rev-biased.
See full article: Common base
- Here base is common to both input and output. Emitter-base jn is fwd-biased and collector-base jn is rev-biased.
2. Common emitter (CE)
- Here emitter terminal is common to both input and output. Emitter-base jn is fwd-biased and collector-base jn is reverse biased.
See full article: Common emitter
- Here emitter terminal is common to both input and output. Emitter-base jn is fwd-biased and collector-base jn is reverse biased.
3. Common collector (Emitter follower) (CC)
- Here collector terminal is common to both input and output. Load is connected to emitter.
See full article: Common collector
- Here collector terminal is common to both input and output. Load is connected to emitter.
Comparison
Parameter | CB | CE | CC |
---|---|---|---|
Phase shift between input and output | zero | 180 | zero |
Current gain | less than 1 | high | high |
Voltage gain | high | high | less than 1 |
Power gain | moderate | high | low to moderate |
Input resistance | low | moderate | high |
Output resistance | high | moderate | low |
Bollywood
Sources for Bollywood articles which qualify RS: WP:RSN can be tacked to verify RS for a source
- [www.rediff.com]
- times of india - which happens to be a lazy newspaper
- the hindu
- other major newspapers
- [www.indiatimes.com]
- [www.indiafm.com]
Math rendering in WP
The "\,\!" at the end is to force rendering to PNG.
|
Guess Who?
I'm not sure if I ever told you, but as one of the people who wanted me to get an account (IP 24...), I will tell you who I registered as: AnonGuy. --əˈnongahy ♫Look What I've Done!♫ 20:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- The extremely sensible editor with the anonymous IP starting 24.-.-.-, whose page was filled with urgings by us lot for him to get his own account. He did. Ref (chew)(do) 17:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi xC
First of all, thanks for the message.
Secondly, I have certain family problems to deal with - It is important, more than every other thing. I understand you and I wish you all the best. Hold on!:)
I've recently posted a message to Haphar. To be very honest, I'm also busy in recent days, real life commitments don't allow me to show presence here for the next few days. But I'll come to discuss on the talk page, when I have the time for it.
Very drastic edits. I appreciate the guy but we have to work together. I just hope that an edit war would not return once the page is unprotected. I hope every user takes care of talking and discussing bfore editing. As you said once: Edit wars are for people who don't have the decency to use talk pages.
Haphar has not discussed yet the reason for every single detail, except saying: It's a fangush in general and giving pair of examples, when actually he has removed more than 10 KB long of content.
Yes, we had our differences, but it always was for improvement and I really believe so. I'm happy with every discussion we had, even if some of them weren't always nice.
OK, I guess I gotta go now. I hope I could be here from time to time. Thank you very much. Best regards, --Shshshsh 15:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please do drop by on the article talk page whenever possible. Best regards,xC | ☎ 13:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Coaching
X, so sorry I haven't followed up on our coaching in a while - my internet connection's been very slow, making anything other than clearing backlogs a chore. With regards to some of the questions you've asked me on the page - I'm not highly experienced in the intricacies of deletion policy, so I've roped in the help of Moreschi (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), who's much better at this sort of thing. He's answered some of your questions on the page. Perhaps I'll ask him to co-coach? :) Anyway, I'll have some more stuff for you there tomorrow. Take care, Riana ⁂ 14:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Good luck
Wish you all the best. But when you do come back, please help us in dealing with Haphar. We'll really need you once the page is unprotected. I'll see what I can do. - shez_15
Mark Hulbert
A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Mark Hulbert, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Sunshine Man 14:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Hello. I saw the edits that User:Haphar made on the Mukerji page. I agree with some of the edits such as the removal of the fashion details, preparation for role etc but not all of them such as the huge amount of info removed from the career section. I will be writing on the discussion page tomorrow or later in the week because for now I want to do some clean-up on the Bollywood pages. Also, I thought I would let you know that I'll be on and off wikipedia for some time because Im going through surgury next month. I think you have personal problems of your own as said to Shahid. Good luck with that, and hope to talk to you soon. Best regards. -- Pa7 18:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Sadiq Abad
NO. YOU ARE WRONG. THE TRUE PRONUNCIATION OF SADIQABAD IS SADIQ ABAD. SO YOU ARE QUITE WRONG AND IT WILL NOT BE A CORRECT DECISION.
Sadiq Abad
No you are wrong. The right pronunciation of Sadiqabad is Sadiq Abad so in my opinion, your this page "Sadiqabad" must be merged with "Sadiq Abad" page. Word "Sadiq" means true and "Abad" means the population so the whole word "Sadiq Abad" means the "population of true peoples". "Abad" also means the place so you can understand the meanings of Sadiq Abad clearly now.
Shahrukh Khan career section
Hiya. I have done the splitting of the Shah Rukh Khan career section. Let me know if you are fine with it or if more changes could be made. Thanks. Shakirfan 23:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)