Talk:Rosenrot

	Archive
	1

Albums Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Merger?

Well whoever put this up for merging didn't make a discussion here. So yeah, merge Reise, Reise Vol.2 into Rosenrot. The info there is relevant to the creation of Rosenrot. - Vicer 09:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no merge, two seperate things, one was a proposed album, one is a different album, with some 'leftover' songs from the proposed album Fethroesforia 20:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i agree with Vicer for a merge - Ella 03:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the merge thing should be removed since there's no such thing as Reise, Reise Vol.2 anymore Iaberis 14:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I removed it! Iaberis 14:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

Some of the song descriptions contain a few oddities (and, sadly, no references). For instance, the article about "Mann gegen Mann" states that "The song is critical of societies' close minded attitudes towards homosexuality and contains many metaphors about homosexuality.", whereas in this article one can read "The song is simply about the subject of homosexuality and seems to avoid taking sides". These statements are obviously totally contradictory, which means that one of them is incorrect and needs to be rectified. After taking a quick look at a translation, it appears that the song does take sides (e.g.: "My family calls me a traitor/I am the nightmare of all fathers"). IronC hris | (talk) 02:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interviews copyright

You really can't just take 3 entire reviews and paste them in here. I think its a copyvio and should be removed, what do others think? Wickethewok 01:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Wickethewok 00:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rosenrot.jpg

Image:Rosenrot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archive
1