Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Afternoons Have Been in Montana
Article currently doesn't establish notability. Joe D (t) 00:46, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, someone link Eli Siegel. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 01:00, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Google doesn't seem to say this poem is notable (165 hits). Delete, or at least redirect to Eli Siegel. --Idont Havaname 02:34, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, this poem is already in the Eli Siegel article. Megan1967 04:17, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, poem by notable poet. Kappa 04:38, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete or put in WikiBooks if they want it. Radiant_* 08:55, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Yoda and... what, it isn't something he said? Oh, ok then, delete. Even notable poets don't need an entry for every poem. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:20, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
- keep this please allow it to grow Yuckfoo 17:19, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup--this poem won the National Poetry Prize and was praised by William Carlos Williams. Meelar (talk) 17:21, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete barring a re-write. Six lines of a poem does not an encyclopedia article make. --Carnildo 19:31, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with Carnildo. No evidence is presented in the article for the notability of these few little scratches of verse. --Stan. 4.246.120.153 20:25, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Transwiki...to Wikibooks or Wikisource? I'm not entirely sure where this would go, but though I think it's notable, it's not encyclopedic.--MikeJ9919 20:27, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Eli Siegel. Not enough content to justify a separate page, even as a stub, but assuming he's a notable poet, this seems to be a notable poem. Andrewa 20:35, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless somebody does an analysis of the poem. Just putting six lines in an article does not make it an eneyclopedia article. RickK 21:17, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Eli Siegel. Same reason as Andrewa --metta, The Sunborn 18:31, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Mcfly85 22:49, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn.--Prem 03:20, May 14, 2005 (UTC)