Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewart Esposito

It looks like this person was an instructor, and there does not seem to be any notable content. Spacefarer 14:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No assertion of notability. /Blaxthos 15:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable Alex Jackl 15:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable EST trainer. The one non-COI source, New York magazine, doesn't even mention him.DGG 17:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No assertion of notability. What may be worth noting however is that this is one of a couple of dozen articles created by Smee (talk · contribs) (and typically edited 70% or more by him) about individuals who are not notable at all except for their contact at some time with Werner Erhard, many of which have already been deleted on the grounds of non-notablity, or poorly-sourced defamatory content, or both. In common with all of those, almost all of the material is derived from Pressman's Outrageous Betrayal, a partisan work which doesn't identify its sources and is highly suspect as a reference source for an encyclopedia. DaveApter 09:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete. Not notable Eastbayway 16:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]