User talk:Puppy Mill

WikiProject British Royalty

Puppy Mill, WikiProject British Royalty wants you!
WikiProject British Royalty is an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

D B D 16:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged Cult CfD

To help with reaching consensus on this CfD, I added categories to sort votes into reasons for Keep or Delete. You can confirm that I sorted you into the right group here Antonrojo 19:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFA/Cynical

Thank you for contributing to my RFA. Unfortunately it failed (final tally 26/17/3). As a result of the concerns raised in my RFA, I intend to undergo coaching, get involved in the welcoming committee and try to further improve the quality of my contributions to AFD and RFA. All the best. Cynical 14:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a sock

User:Puppy Mill is not a sockpuppet of Daniel Brandt. User: Puppy Mill is in Washington, D.C. I do not know Brandt. I communicated with him once via email back in 1999. Are editors allowed to believe that Brandt and others who don't want biographies on Wikipedia should have their wishes respected, without automatically being accused of being his sock? It is possible for other Wikipedians to hold differing views on WP:BLP without automatically being accused of being a sock? This does not reflect well on this project, or at least not on the fact that the person who jumped to conclusions so quickly is an admin and a candidate for ArbCom. Puppy Mill 01:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thanks a lot for your support. I highly appreciate it. Biruitorul 02:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The mystery of Wikipedia policy re: Lyndon LaRouche

I saw that you tried to get a straight answer on this from Will Beback on the ArbCom election page. I too have been trying to unravel this mystery, without much success. See Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Lyndon_LaRouche#From_clarification_request. --Tsunami Butler 23:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smalfut.jpg removed from your user page

An image or media file, Image:Smalfut.jpg, has been removed from your userpage or user talk page because it was licensed as fair use. Wikipedia's fair use policy states that fair use images should only be used in the article namespace. As a result, although users are often given a great amount of latitude in the type of content that is allowed on their user pages, it is requested that you abide by this policy. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms. For more information, see Wikipedia's fair use policy and an accompanying essay on the removal of fair use images. Thank you for your cooperation.

-- tariqabjotu 02:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

English-only movement RM

A move you suggested earlier is being debated at Talk:English-only movement. — AjaxSmack 18:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

This comment is not at all civil or constructive, and has been removed. Please don't do that again. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you are -- who? Puppy Mill 01:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Informing you that being uncivil is not allowed or appropriate. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

zzzzzz Puppy Mill 01:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. You seem to have some sort of grudge against TerriersFan (talk · contribs); for example, this, and this. Even more puzzlingly, you don't seem to have had contact with this user before beginning the pursuit of your grudge, and your username seems to be tied to this grudge. All of this says to me that you're a sock created to pursue a grudge.

Care to respond to this? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]