Talk:LJM (company)
Appearance
Business Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
LJM (company) was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 10, 2007). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
GA failed
This fails almost every single one of the GA criteria. Please view these criteria, and expand the article considerably with sources and inline citations before nominating again. --Nehrams2020 23:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm going to fail it again for the same reasons as before. All questionable information should have inline citations and you should have more sources within the article. If possible, add an image or two that has an appropriate license and fair use rationale if necessary. The article needs a lot more expansion, because right now it is looking more like a stub, or very early stages start class. I'd recommend looking at a lot of other GAs to get a better idea of articles that meet the criteria or more ideas for expansion (look at the business articles). Although new information was added in the last attempt, that still needs to be sourced as well. Let me know if you have any questions and I'll try to get back to you as soon as I can. Although the article is a long way off from a GA, keep expanding and citing, and it may one day be a GA. Remember to review the GA criteria. Keep up the good work and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 21:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Does it still fail GA or can it get higher now? 128.32.225.98 23:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)