User talk:Qst
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him/her feedback at an editor review. You may comment on his/her edits at Wikipedia:Editor review/Qst. |
User:Qst/Icons User:Qst/Menu User:Qst/TalkLayout
renaming
Well done with your renaming :)), luckily this time a troll didn't take it to intentionally cause trouble. Francisco Tevez 05:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Hehe, I know thank you! I haven't spoke to you in a while, also sorry if I upset you a few days back when I said I was too busy . The Sunshine Man is now Qst 05:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- You never upset me. Don't worry about it. I am just taking a long break before I start editing rapidly again, not your fault. Francisco Tevez 05:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Thanks --The Sunshine Man is now Qst 05:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- You never upset me. Don't worry about it. I am just taking a long break before I start editing rapidly again, not your fault. Francisco Tevez 05:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Rationale added at above image by request. -- M (speak/spoken) 10:05, 1 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Great I've checked it over and its fine....The Sunshine Man is now Qst 11:10, 1 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Reply
See my talk. (and if you have it watchlisted, just tell me) --(Review Me) R you talking to me?Contribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 11:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- OK — cheers --The Sunshine Man is now Qst 11:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Hi.
You asked me to re-edit this page. I've done so. Is what I've done okay now? Thanks. Doom jester 07:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Great. The Sunshine Man is now Qst 07:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Thank you.
Thank you for your kind editor review. Wishes, wpktsfs 16:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC-7)
I gave you enough imformation
[removed]
- I have removed the above for several reasons, I suggest you read up on the civility policy and I kindly ask you to take your tone down as there was no need to insult or swear at me, secondly I cannot see any warnings or messages left to you by myself nor can I see the article which you mentioned in the deletion log, I think you may have got the wrong user here.... The Sunshine Man is now Qst 07:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:20, 3 July 2007 (UTC-7)
question
Where do you get all the high quality images used on your talk page? Francisco Tevez 09:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Well, one of two I have "borrowed" from other editors (*evil laughs*) and I have also been browsing through the Wikimedia commons for example nuvola icons and Crystal clear, I can provide some more links if you need them =) The Sunshine Man is now Qst 09:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC-7)
::I am sorry, don't come down hard on me, I just can't seem to remember it. Francisco Tevez 09:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Kazuma
If I take an image, and it's altered, as in, I do work to it, is it considered my copyright at that point or no? Since it's not in the orginal form that it is?The Cleveland Browns are awesome! 12:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- No if its from another website and is on Wikipedia it is fair use and is there property. Qst 12:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Regarding "Tacoma Dome" edit to Geodesic Dome article
Hi there--
I see you reverted my recent edit removing the Tacoma Dome from the list of large Geodesic Domes. Maybe I'm not doing the edits in a proper fashion, but I am quite certain that the Tacoma Dome is not a geodesic dome (and the Wikipedia article on the Tacoma Dome agrees with me on this point). So what is the correct way to go about correcting the list in the Geodesic Dome article?
Thanks. If I happen to not be online, you can email me at David.at.PandoraHouse.org -- I'm interested in learning more about contributing constructively to Wikipedia.
12:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC-7)David Dailey Shoreline WA USA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.194.100 (talk • contribs) Moved from redirect page by Will (aka Wimt).
- Thanks Wimt — left a note on your talk page. I reverted the edit because you replaced some content with question marks, see diff. Email removed for your own privacy. Qst 12:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC-7)
question
do you by any chance live in newcastle upon tyne? 81.158.97.243 13:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- No. Qst 02:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Tinapa Logo
I have updated the image according to your instructions, I hope it meets your standards.
Lephilippe 08:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Yes thats fine. Qst 11:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Hi - while I understand your 'vote' to delete this article based its previous state, I've now done a bit of work on it to assert notability and providing a reliable reference. Sure, it's still nothing but a stub, but verifiable subject notability rather than article quality is what we need to consider at afd's. I hope you can have look at the article and reconsider your position. many thanks Merbabu 03:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Thanks for that edit :) Andrij Kursetsky ⊗ 09:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- No problemo! Thanks for your warnings to.... . Qst 09:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Reminder
Don't forget to move the AfD template link on relisted discussions to the most recent day (as in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vilayna! :) — Scientizzle 09:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Oh apologies, I close them as a non admin and I use one of the monobook.js tools, sorry about that.... Qst 09:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Yeah, the key is to move the {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foo}} from its original spot to the curent day so that the relisted debate is actually, you know, seen by others. The js tools don't do the move. Don't worry about the mistake--I did it myself back in the day... — Scientizzle 10:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- . Qst 10:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Sorry!
Sorry, I didn't realise that I had done it without signing.
Sorry again, microchip08 09:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Its fine its just its strongly discouraged, happy editing! Qst 09:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
pictures without a copyright tag
Can you tell me the template which is used on pictures without a copyright tag and how to use it? Francisco Tevez 10:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Mhh, if you created the image you can use {{PD-self}} but fair use ones should be used if the image is for example a DVD cover but are selectable at Special:Upload, if an image has no copyright tag you should leave {{subst:nld}}. Cheers, Qst 10:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Dear Qst
I replaced Image:Flag of England.jpg with Image:Flag of England.svg on User:Qst/Userboxes. Now you have a nice lossless version of the flag. :) I hope you don't mind. Cheers, Iamunknown 12:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- No of course I dont mind, infact thank you.... . Qst 13:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
I find your contribution to the deletion discussion confusing, since you bolded Delete but your comment says to tag as historical, which implies keep. — The Storm Surfer 20:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Heya,
I saw you placed a tag on an image I uploaded, but I don't understand the reason provided in the template. Could you please provide some specifics so I can fix this problem?
Thanks in advance! -- Daveydweeb (chat/review!) 03:47, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Vandalism
Great work reverting vandalism with VP today. I just raised Wdefcon to level 2. Vandalism is extreme today. Happy reverting! Yours sincerely, Eddie 08:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Aww thanks, I noticed its moved up to 2, theres loads of vandalism uderway, great work with you too.... Qst 08:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
A little gift
I've left you a little gift here. I hope you like it! Yours sincerely, Eddie 11:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Aww thank you.... Qst 11:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
RFA
Sorry about your RFA. Politics rule 11:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Its fine, I'm just frankly annoyed about Moreschi. Qst 11:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- I didn't know that you had an RfA. I would have nominated you! Too bad it didn't succeed. Oh, well. Pa'lante siempre. :-) Happy editing! Yours sincerely, Eddie 11:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Just a note: I posted a question on your RFA a few minutes after it closed. I just took too long to post it. Please ignore it. You may never have noticed, but I didn't want you to think I was piling on you. Ryan was kind enough to quickly catch my mistake and revert it. Look forward to seeing you hang around, and maybe try again down the road! Hiberniantears 18:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Civility warning
Why have you been uncivil on a users talk page? Please Do not do this. Reguardless of the editor I have a right to keep people civil. So stop, or you will be blocked from editing. Francisco Tevez 11:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- No-ones getting blocked, so less of the warnings please. Ryan Postlethwaite 11:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)`
- No its OK Ryan, I'm not bothered about this place anymore, nor am I annoyed at you its people like Moreschi. Francisco was quite within his rights. Qst 11:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- No-ones getting blocked, so less of the warnings please. Ryan Postlethwaite 11:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)`
- Whats the point, you come here with the best intentions at heart and you are swore at by other editors, contribute loads of your time to this place and what do you get in return, NOTHING!!! you, Francisco are one of the kind editors but frankly I dont see the fucking point anymore to continue in this nasty community, so much for us being friendly, we are over-ridden by idiots who think just because they're sysops they can push people around, I couldn't really care anymore whether I'm a Wikipedian or not. Qst 11:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Sssshhhhh. Stop it, I am not against you. Stop the swearing, you are being uncivil aswell as him. I thought you said by your userbox you didn't want to be an admin, yes many of the users are annoying and uncivil, and they trash your RFA'S. Which is why I will never go up. Francisco Tevez 11:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
Yes you are right. The sysops do push people around, and we are overidden by idiots, I see everything you are saying. Francisco Tevez 11:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Good for you dear Francisco, you understand..... I dont want to be a part of this community anymore. Qst 11:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
- Would you like your account blocked and your userpages deleted, if you intend to leave ? Nick 18:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- What? No, we don't do the former. Stop suggesting it. --Cyde Weys 18:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Would you like your account blocked and your userpages deleted, if you intend to leave ? Nick 18:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Please stay. Just because idiots like them are around, don't let them win, I hate them too but I stay here so I can do something constructive in life. Francisco Tevez 11:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC-7)
I don't condone the incivility running rampant right after the RfA, but, Qst, why don't you try taking the higher ground and ignore Moreschi? —Kurykh 18:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think I need a break, I cant ignore Moreschi because if he stoppe others do exactly the same, there are only a few admins which I'd consider to be decent here. I dont want sympathy or anything I just need a break, you devote hours of your life to this place and no one appreciates it, Qst 18:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Of course we appreciate you, you just aren't quite ready yet. Majorly (talk) 18:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Qst. I think Moreschi's language may have not been the most civil, but it wasn't aimed at you at all. He was just frustrated, that's all, and I think your keeping telling him to stop isn't going anywhere. Fact is, it's over, and you keeping it up just keeps the pointless drama going. I hope you succeed if you try again, but this unfortunate conflict right now isn't helping really. Cheers. Majorly (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)Whoa, whoa, whoa. What just happened here? I just left you a message and you were fine!!! Eddie 18:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Qst lashed out at Moreschi for his (Moreschi's) comments on his RfA. I agree with Qst on this point (and others, but this in particular), Moreschi could have avoided using the offending term, or else this wouldn't have happened. —Kurykh 18:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry with what happened to your RFA, but stay cool as a cucumber. Yes, Moreschi and Matthew were uncivil to you, but that doesn't mean you should be too. They can be pretty blunt. bibliomaniac15 BUY NOW! 18:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
A thread on WP:ANI has been stated by me. Please explain what happened, [1]. Francisco Tevez 18:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Dear Qst
Smile a little, smile a little, all along the road; Smile upon the troubled pilgrims whom you pass and meet; Smile upon your undone labour; not for one who grieves Please, dear Qst, don't be sad... this will pass, trust me, and Love, |
Quick note
Hi Qst. I'm just back from a Wikibreak as you may know so I haven't seen anything of the events that lead up to this - I didn't even know you were up for RfA but I would hate for you to throw away everything you've worked for here because you're upset - rightly or wrongly so. I am convinced that you will make a good admin, if not now then in the future. I know not passing RfA must come as a blow but remember that it isn't a final decision and that you can earn a lot of respect from continue to edit quietkly as you have done and being helpful around the project. I hope you will step back for a bit and not edit until you are calmer. I find your assistance at WP:CHU valuable and know you do a lot of good work elsewhere - please carry on with that and don't lash out at others. I think you'll be an admin someday - the better you act now, the sooner that day will be. Best wishes, WjBscribe 18:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- I came here for the purpose of writing something like this and the other comments above. Please take a deep breath, relax for awhile, and come back when you are ready to resume editing again. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 18:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Another note
It is better to be kind, than to be right. Qst, mind you, your edit summaries will follow you throughout your editing career, and currently, they do not seem like the edits of a respectful editor. Lets move along, please. --wpktsfs 18:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
You've got mail
I'm still catching up on what caused this madness, but I've sent you an e-mail. Sean William @ 18:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
oh no
You're not resigning are you? Well you weren't much of an adoptee behaving like that, for the past few days I've felt you have been nasty to me. Francisco Tevez 18:51, 6 July 2007 (UTC)