User talk:Moe Epsilon/Archive 5
W.marsh's RfA
Thank you for your support on my RfA. The final outcome was (30/2/0). I will do my best at the position I now am in. Thanks again! --W.marsh 03:03, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Conversations
I am interested in copying the code to get what you have on the top of your talk page, but I will be placing mine in a sub-topic or perhaps a sub/section. Almac 03:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the humor. I found where you got the headings, by using the Search. I see that it individually lists the urls. What I was looking for was a "what links here" that was limited to User Talk pages (like the search engine can limit that way} except that would be dynamically updated as I have conversaions with more folks. AlMac 04:02, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
If you would be so kind as to point me to how you did it, if in fact it is some kind of automated thing, I may figure out how to thank you properly.
- See on top of my talk page where I identify who I plagarized stuff from.
- I have now given out several Barnstars.
- See User talk:Jayant412/Userbox design kit specifically Userbox Enthusiasts, where some professionals such as yourself, may come to the attention of additional novices like myself. AlMac 04:08, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
new AlMac message
To restate myself. I saw that on the top you had a chunk of links to other Wiki people talk pages where you had had conversations with them & I thought "Cool, I want to do that also on my talk pages" and "How does SWD316 do that?" so I noodled around what I could find, that I have learned so far how to do on Wiki, and I could not see how you did it, other than manually maintaining, which is more work than justified for the value of this thing.
So, if there is a way that you set this up, and it automatically stays current like the stuff in Toolbox user contributions not need us to update anything, it always there, that is what I would like to learn from you. There is no urgency here. It is just something that I thought was excessively cool.
I have on my watch list, connections to various user talk pages, where I have forgotten why ... I might not need there any more. I thought this might be a nice alternative and also feed concept of friends of friends with similar interests. AlMac 15:39, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks but let's not
- I can create you one of those headings if you want one. NO, there is no way to automatically do it. You have to do it manually if you want it.
Thanks anyway, let's not do this. I am humongously behind on maintaining other stuff that is far more important. It was a nice idea, but now it is time to move on. AlMac 17:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Howcheng's RfA
Thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship despite our earlier misunderstanding. I was successfully promoted with a final tally of 74/0/0. I will endeavour not to let you down. Thanks again. Howcheng 06:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
WWE divas
Could you help me here, on the List of WWE Divas page Wwfanz is so certain that Sara Calaway and Marissa McMahon are divas. I think they should be removed because Marissa has never been classed as a diva never appeared on Raw or Smackdown only ever appeared on Livewire, she works in public relations. Sara Calaway hasnt been involved with the wwe in over 3years and hasnt appeared since the ending of the storyline she was involved in. Why are they still included and classes as divas? Lil crazy thing 22:28, 27 December 2005
RfA thanks from Deathphoenix
Hi SWD316,
I just wanted to thank you for supporting me in my RfA. To tell you the truth, I was surprised by all the support I've gotten. I never saw myself as more than an occasional Wiki-hobbyist.
My wife sends her curses, as Wikipedia will likely suck up more of my time. She jokingly (I think) said she was tempted to log on to Wikipedia just to vote Oppose and let everyone know that she didn't want her husband to be an admin.
I'll make sure your trust in me is founded. --Deathphoenix 15:07, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
Hi there SWD316,
Thanks for inviting me to join the Professional wrestling WikiProject. I've joined =)
Rakez 21:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. I fixed it up earlier just because I noticed that many of the inactive members were in reality very active. I mean, one can't get more active than Theresa knott! Let me be the first (well, second to Titoxd) to welcome you back to Esperanza! Cheers, Bratsche 22:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Vandal
I have removed OSJ's rubbish from your page. Doctoring someone else's comment to add in a new allegation pretending to be them is a serious issue IMHO and I'll be issuing a warning to OSJ about it. Jtdirl 00:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Vandals
Ideally, you should list them at WP:AIV, since other admins are watching that page too. Titoxd 04:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- No problem. Titoxd 05:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Sockpuppets
Wouldn't the sockpuppets you mentioned at WP:AIAV be better posted on WP:AN/I...? -- SCZenz 05:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Cool, sounds good. Sutff at WP:AIAV doesn't usually stay up for very long; ideally anyone on the list can either be blocked or warned, and removed. -- SCZenz 05:13, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Johnny Spade
I only just noticed you had turned the Johnny Spade page into a redirect... but even though "Johnny Spade" was used as a ring name for John Hennigan infact this is a different wrestler. --- Paulley 15:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- On saying that, i even suspected it a one point (see its history page) --- Paulley
The Jiggler
Blocked :) FireFox 17:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- He's blocked too :) FireFox 17:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- I think we'll leave that one for now, he only made one mild edit and stopped since. Tell me if he make any more. FireFox 11:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Hitching Your Cart to Chadbryant Is a Bad Idea
- See the "Note For Admins" on my talk page. Chadbryant 03:17, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Obviously, those "fun and games" include starting up another dozen quickly-blocked sockpuppets... - Chadbryant 17:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Esperanza elections
Thanks for voting for me in the Esperanza elections. I've been appointed to the Advisory Committee, thanks to your show of confidence in me. I'll do my best to make you proud, but please feel free to ask me for help at any time or to give me tips as to what you would like to do. Thanks for being an active member of Esperanza! I'll see you around. Titoxd 00:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Esperanza elections
- You are welcome and thank you for voting for me.--DakotaKahn 06:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Esperanza elections
- You're welcome, SWD316. Banes 06:22, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Esperanza Elections
Thanks for voting for me at the Esperanza Elections.
I've made my way into the Advisory Committee, so if you ever need any help or have any queries about the stuff we do, please do not hesitate to ask me. Thanks again, FireFox 11:50, 31 December 2005 (UTC)ARB
Complaining on the arbitration page will get you neither sympathy nor votes. Go ahead and try again for adminship. You probably have a chance. I just seriously doubt you would make a good admin. Medical conditions are not excuses for misbehaviour. If you blocked another user because you were having some sort of bipolar outburst we'd still have to deal with the consequences. freestylefrappe 01:32, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Bureaucrat
If you really feel the community needs another bureaucrat, then I will accept the nomination from either of you. -- Francs2000 21:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Although hold your horses until tomorrow to actually do it because I'm not going to be online again until then. -- Francs2000 21:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, you're fantastic! -- Francs2000 23:56, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
DANNY BASHAM
Danny basham should be on the inactive list on current wwe roster it says he hasnt wrestled since september. DINOMAN 18:27 3 January 2006 (GMT)
My RfB
Don't worry and I appreciate your support. OwenX's accusation that I was taking part in the stupid fiasco already got my blood boiling, I've been doing some word association to calm down. I'm off to the supermarket now to do a bit of retail therapy. Actually we just need some supplies, but it gets me away from the computer... -- Francs2000 21:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- Actually regarding OwenX's reply, which I can't dispute, I think I've just lost bureaucratship this time around. With five days left to go other voters will see that comment and follow suit and oppose me. I think I'll go and watch CSI Miami now and come back online tomorrow. -- Francs2000 22:42, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- Re OwenX, holy cow I wasn't expecting that to happen... -- Francs2000 12:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Project
Count me in, I already added myself to the list... Joecashfire 23:16, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
That annoying user is reverting everything in the Sandbox. Who would have thought, an edit war in the Sandbox? Fun stuff. --FrankCostanza 02:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi there, would you be able to show me where there was discussion on whether more bureaucrats are required, (e.g. are the current ones overworked?) if such a discussion has taken place? enochlau 05:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm of the opinion that we shouldn't have more bureaucrats than are necessary to get the job done. Otherwise, bureaucratship becomes like the "next level" after adminship, which is wrong and not how it's meant to be. If there is evidence that we need more, then I'm happy to change my mind. If you're wondering I'm opposing why Francs2000 in particular, note that I also opposed the other RfB on the page. enochlau 05:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup
Hello SWD316, thank you for your support in the Esperanza election. Let me know if I can do anything for you in return. with kind regards Gryffindor 16:17, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Qwertysoup
You must be having a laugh! I thought I'd heard of this name before... This is the user I had a word with the other day about scoring 1,595.37 on the Wikipediholic test. I left him alone, assuming good faith, but now I'm having second thoughts. I don't exactly think he is a vandal, and there is nothing he can be blocked for to be honest. I find it pretty annoying that anyone can just come along and act like they've been here for years, especially on the Wikipediholic test - he probably just wants to be the best. I'll keep an eye on him. FireFox 12:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
WoWjUnKiE7290
Hi. I had already unblocked this user as I notice the first contribution (just before I blocked) was an assurance that he was not Willie on Wheels. I hope I have not been suckered into this (as I was by your spoof "new message" notice at the top of your page, which I think was a pretty cheap trick, and could profitably be removed). --RobertG 16:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for your support on my request for bureaucratship.
The final outcome was (70/5/0), so I am now a bureaucrat. I seriously didn't expect so many good comments from everybody and I appreciated the constructive criticism from those that gave it. If you have any queries, suggestions or problems with any of my actions as a bureaucrat then please leave me a note. -- Francs2000 21:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Wikipediaholic score
Sorry I din't include you into the users I spammed about the situation on the tests talk page. If you like, after the decision about the false score is settled, I can add you to the top 20. Moe 22:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'd like that. -MegamanZero 22:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- NO I dont mind. Make it happen. --Cool Cat 13:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Problem with IP Address person
Last December I deleted a message from the Wyoming Talk Page stating the Wyoming did not exist, the same IP Address person who posted it claimed I was part of a conspiracy to put Wyoming on the map so to speak then I posted I was sorry for deleting and posted,
Sorry, for deleting you comments but answer me these questions He wrote "I personally don't think Wyoming exists. Have you ever met anyone from Wyoming? The only person I know of that is from Wyoming is Vice President Cheney. This just suggests the biggest government conspiracy since pineapples. I hereby request that this article be deleted. I happen to know that the land that the "state" occupies does not exist either. The government has put up border signs in "neighboring" states to create the illusion that you are traveling through Wyoming. I say let this be the first site to stand up to the American government and say we won't buy your conspirasies any more. We must educate the people!"
I wrote If there is no Wyoming
Where is the majority of Yellowstone National Park the world's first National Park Located?
Where is the South Pass of the Oregon Trial located?
Where is Devil's Tower located?
Where was Rulon Gardner born?
Where is Grand Teton National Park?
What are your verifiable sources for Wyoming not existing? ^ That is why I deleted his comments so I am sorry for deleting them but I asked next time when he’d post something, please register a free wikipeda account or you won’t be taken seriously. PS My best friend is from Wyoming so I do know someone from there. BionicWilliam 22:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC) He then posted
Fiends He wrote My best fiend is from Wyoming as well. I mentioned him above (Cheney).
The I wrote that I ment friend. The wrote However, what are your verifiable sources for Wyoming not existing? Please remember Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Oh if you edit the Wyoming page don't forget to post your verifiable sources because Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought and if you post unverifiable information it's vandalism then me or somebody else will revert your changes. If you have no sources for the state not existing beside Cheney then it does exist. Oh also answer my questions if you want to. BionicWilliam 23:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
I think I’m taking this person to seriously but I want to stop them before he vandalize the Wyoming Article
My Question is what I should do now? Thanks BionicWilliam 00:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
Yeah, I've already stopped, it's so boring and wikiusers are tightasses about it. :( - Rudykog 18:03, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- I should note that it was and still is a joke though. - Rudykog 19:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi
Hey SWD316, its WoWjUnKiE7290, just thought i would pop a post onto your discussion page, to begin and further my wiki invasion = P WoWjUnKiE7290 00:39, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Eric Bischoff
From Eric's page: ""YOUUUUU'RE FIIIRED!!!," effectively ending Bischoff's tenure as RAW's General Manager. WWE Champion John Cena aided McMahon in “taking out the trash” by delivering an FU to the former GM. Judge McMahon himself then tossed Bischoff into a garbage dumpster and drove him out of the arena. He is expected by many backstage with WWE to be done with professional wrestling." I edit something twice, then you freakin' threaten me about it! Next time, how about just a simple "that's not true"? And maybe, just maybe, some people know more than you? 70.111.205.97
You threatened me with banation. 70.111.205.97
hi
HI!!!! WoWjUnKiE7290 15:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Hey!
Could you edit Horseheads High School please. Courier new
- Please don't delete it. Isn't its significance POV anyways? I do attend it--it's my last year--and all these things are true. Anyways, wikipedia is known so very, very obscure topics, which obviously cannot be found in traditional encyclopedias. Courier new
The Puppeteer
I think that if they all admit to being sockpuppets of each other and one is vandalizing, then we can block them all when the time comes, but I wouldn't be able to say for certain. Ilyanep 19:16, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
BTW, you're 'you have new messages' thing on the top of your page made me think my talk page was vandalised for a sec ;) Ilyanep 19:18, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- It was kinda funny, after I noticed it wasn't really my talk page ;) — Ilyanep 02:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Puppeteer
Thanks for alerting me. I have to admit that I hadn't noticed the nature of the User name when I left the message about vandalism. Have you raised this at WP:AN/I? If not, it might be worth doing it, as I think that all but one (at least) of the accounts should probably be banned. --Mel Etitis 23:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Wikiscore
ha ha ha, that was a scream, I had that score in mid-October; my edit-countitis has increased by many times since then, so much so that I am afraid of taking the test again. I hope some one will break your record, though ;). --Gurubrahma 10:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Still a little new to Wikipedia
I've been refreshing your talk page for the last 2 minutes and wondering if you were leaving more messages to my talk page. That's a damn good one. I admit I clicked it. Well, I've been meaning to ask someone... anyone about this for a while and since we got off on the right foot, I thought I'd ask it here. You know when someone edits a page and in the edit description it shows up as an arrow pointing to a grayed out section; eg. ---> The Brand Extension. I've been calling it the best kept simple secret on Wikipedia because no matter how many help pages I go to, I can't figure out how to do it and I'm sure it's something ridiculously simple and I'm going to end up regretting having this recorded in Wikipedia history forever. Thanks for the help. tv316 18:38, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Vandal
The twit who left the above illiterate message, and who vandalised your page, is one in a long line of abusive sockpuppets; I've blocked him indefinitely. --Mel Etitis 20:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Re: Thanks
No problem! I love that new messages spoof. ;) Sango123 20:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
YW
You're welcome; I'll go through the history in just a sec and do blocks where needed. Essjay 03:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks from a New User
Thanks for the invitation on my talk page to ask you questions. I was wondering if you (or anybody else who reads this note) wouldn't mind looking over what I've been working on and letting me know if I'm doing a good job.
The big thing I've worked on is the Anagrams board game article. I made a small edit to Maria Montessori and I've also posted some comments on Talk:Jack Kevorkian and Talk:Serial killer, as creepy as that is.
I was wondering if these efforts so far seemed in the wiki spirit and represented wiki-worthy work? I'm so excited about being an official user and I hope that I'm getting it right.
Thanks again! -- Max the Anagrammarian 22:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Re: Thanks from a New User
Great. Thanks so much for looking over things. Much appreciated. Will try to watch over wiki-ing! ^_^
I'll have to tell my girlfriend that we have a mutual Wikipedia friend now.
Anagrammarian 22:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Sorry
I understand and I shan't change any of your user pages again. My apologies. --Mystaker1 04:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Rakion Page
You sent me a vandalism message concerning the Rakion page which I'd like to dispute. My last edit was deleting a section that was just added that day which was outside the scope of an encylopedia article of the game (it went into specific strategies for each class). The section was also NPOV and used informal language. I saw you reverted article wiping by 67.39.189.233, but you went back to a point which also re-added things I deleted in good faith, like the last section of the profanity filter section about how to bypass the filter (this sort of information shouldn't be included since it encourages doing such a thing). I've been watching over the Rakion page for a couple weeks now and slightly resent the claim that I have vandalized it. As for using an unregistered IP and not signing in, this computer is shared with my housemates, so I just don't sign in here. (I don't want to be confused for a random vandal). Sorry to take up your time, but something just irked me about being called a vandal and being refered to the sandbox.
Oh, about the talk page, those were my entries that no longer had any relevance to anything. I'll be sure not to remove any more of my old, badly formatted discussion from the talk page again. 209.158.250.104 02:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Anon blocked
Happy to help fight the vandals. I've blocked the anon for 24 hours. Canderson7 02:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
No problem :)--Shanel 03:04, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the assist...
...On catching the vandalism on my talk page. Thanos6 07:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
I've blocked for 24 hours and sprotected the talk page. Canderson7 17:02, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Nice of you to say, I'm always glad to help stop the vandals. Canderson7 17:08, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
The user has been blocked for persistent vandalism. KHM03 17:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
I just now got your message. I'm sorry I couldn't be of help at the time, but I've watchlisted the talk page and will sprotect if the vandal starts back up. Canderson7 23:13, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Wikipediholic Test
I only started after your edits, so it's really no problem (The only edit you got in after I copied over the list of questions is you rounding off your score). So thanks for removing those. At the moment, I am organizing them into sections to make it easier to count scores. Ilyanep 03:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- Mayhaps a limit. I'll remove all questions with 0 and most of them with negative points. — Ilyanep 03:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!
Wikiholic (par excellance ?)
I just saw your score. Shit. I almost suffocated on my seat. How the heck can a guy be so holic! May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 15:00, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you, SWD316, for your support of my RfA. I will do my best in my new role and welcome your feedback. NoSeptember 16:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)