Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 July 13
![→[[:Image:Chabon.jpg]]](#Image:Chabon.jpg){kind=link}
July 13
- Copyvio: see copright statement of owner at http://www.globalsecurity.org/copyright.htm The Land 17:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC).
- Non-free image of a living person that is used just to show what the person looks like. Violates WP:NFCC #1 as it can be replaced by a free image. The subject makes frequent public appearences. Nv8200p talk 00:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mgoldstein89 (notify | contribs).
- Orphan image. Pages that did use this logo were removed via CSD. — Mdwyer 01:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Hammersfan (notify | contribs).
- Obsoleted by Image:GuardsTRF.svg, which is on Commons, rendering this image now orphaned. — Makaristos 04:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, was only used in article deleted for lack of notability. But|seriously|folks 05:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Oysterhurxley932 (notify | contribs).
- Since you guys are deletion-crazy with the crowning moments, I expect this won't stand a chance. Guess what? I'm getting vindictive (in other words, fails NFC #1 & #2 — PageantUpdater 06:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC).
- Orphaned, was only used in an article deleted for lack of notability. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 08:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Taking a photo of a portrait doesn't grant the photographer rights to that image. Obsolete. By Image:AnnRichards.jpg. Which probably shouldn't be around, either, considering it's nonfree and we have free alternatives, but that's for another deletion nomination. — Rebelguys2 talk 09:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
(* KEEP as revised: License has been corrected to "Non-free fair use" with detailed rationale, noting, "As a small excerpt from the original portrait, at low resolution, the closeup image does not expose the original portrait to unauthorized complete or high-resolution copying." Also added "References" section, linking full-view of framed portrait (darkened) to document relative small size of excerpt being used in Wikipedia. -Wikid77 13:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- And what does the official state portrait show that Image:AnnRichards 20050210.jpg doesn't already do?
- Non-free, decorative use, not needed to show that the guy won an award, not usable to illustrate the person – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think this image could be replaced by a free one. Why would you want to? Well, then, it's also merely decorative. – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Full-page ad. Ads have a good claim for "fair use", legally, but I think its use here is merely decorative. – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Magazine cover used to illustrate person – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mrmanhattanproject (notify | contribs).
- Poster, used decoratively I believe – Quadell (talk) (random) 11:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Decorative, no encyclopedic purpose – Quadell (talk) (random) 12:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Image is a pixel for pixel cropped horizontal flip of Image:Awilda Carbia.jpg. The latter image was originally uploaded by the same uploader as the former image. When the latter image was uploaded, the uploader tried to claim the image was PD because it was published in the U.S. before 1923, an impossibility due to the subject not having been born until 1938. The latter image was updated with a fair use tag (but no source) indicating it to be a promotional photo. Due to our fair use policies on images of living people, the image was removed from the article it was used on. Subsequent to this, User:Entre-Nos uploaded Image:Wiwi.JPG, claiming "It's a portrait of Awilda Carbia digitized by myself, with the persmission of the photographer, Erick Borcherding, a Puerto Rican photographer, and released to public domain. It's a resized small photo" Given the source, I seriously doubt this is the case and this image constitutes a copyright violation. — Durin 13:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Blurgle Fragle (notify | contribs).
- Completing a nomination by an anon. Claimed reason: unencyclopedic. I am neutral.- The Evil Spartan 14:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kazztawdal (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned image of zero ENC. use — Pedro | Chat 14:57, 13 July 2007 (UTC).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, likely Copyright violation - while copyright on the original work has expired, it is likely that the copyright on both the belt buckle derivative work and the photo of such are held by studio925, the creator of the belt buckle BigrTex 16:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by [[User talk:Elysium 73).
- A copyright violation of WorldStadia.com, suggest that this image's tag be changed, or a better-quality picture be found (note: This building no longer exists, so is non-replaceable). — 132.199.35.204 16:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Haraldszeeman (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader (only remaining contribution), likely Unencyclopedic - uploaded for {{prod}}ed Ondrej Brody BigrTex 17:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Dickhooker (notify | contribs).
- Non-free poster used in an article to depict the object in the poster, not the poster itself. howcheng {chat} 17:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Non-free image of a TV series cast not necessary to the articles it is in. Could be replaced by individual shots of each actor. howcheng {chat} 17:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- It illustrates the original cast members and how they appeared in the first season. --DrBat 18:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- And how is that significant? howcheng {chat} 18:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- It illustrates the original cast members and how they appeared in the first season. --DrBat 18:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Non-English ad, only used decoratively – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Howdoustop85 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, questionable public domain release, little context to determine where/if it could be used BigrTex 18:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Howdoustop85 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, questionable public domain release, not enough context to determine encyclopedic value BigrTex 18:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Non-free images of people as dolls. No encyclopedic use. – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Alientraveller (notify | contribs).
- Used decoratively – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- In the rationale, it is claimed "Not replaceable as 1) a group photo is not likely to be arranged again 2) the women will no longer look as they did in 1985 during the PMRC events". However I think text and free images would replace this image adequately. – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Obsolete (Image:PA-358.svg is currently being used BigrTex 18:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chancemichaels (notify | contribs).
- Full page ad, only used decoratively – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by IrisKawling (notify | contribs).
- Decorative, blurry, replaceable if needed – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- blurry, text could describe just as well – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Nehrams2020 (notify | contribs).
- Non-free film screenshot not being used in actor's article without any criticial commentary on the scene being depicted. howcheng {chat} 18:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Non-free book cover. Cover art may not be used for identification only, but must be used within the context of critical commentary about the book. howcheng {chat} 18:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, likely either Copyright violation or Unencyclopedic BigrTex 19:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
MPorrazzo images
Nine related images, please see this page. (If I should not have done it that way, please notify me and I will do the work of fixing it.) Tualha (Talk) 19:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- copyvio, used as a joke I think – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Why is this not fair use? I own the photograph—I paid for it. Michael Chabon User:Vanzorn
- Why not pretend to be Jonathon Leathum instead?