I feel that for an article about a film, the DVD cover is one of the most important images that could be included. A critical commentary about the DVD or its cover is irrelevant. I see many DVD covers in film articles that are not "discussed", they are merely used to help the article. I feel that deleting this image would be wrong as DVD covers are almost as important to a film's article as a theatrical poster. Donaldd2301:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, he's living. This is a 2002 photo of Robert Van Deventer, who was a major network radio personality during the 1940s as a teenager, and there's a full paragraph about him in the article. The entire Van Deventer family made up the panel of the radio show Twenty Questions. This photo is, I believe, by the Poughkeepsie DJ Bill Eberle. After an extensive search, this is the only photo I could find of any Twenty Questions panelist. it appeared without copyright notice or credit on Eberle's site. Eberle has taken quite a few other recent photos of 1930s/1940s radio personalities. I would like to contact him about using his photos. If so, what procedure or what copyright tag would be appropriate? Pepso206:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot showing a woman's face. It doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that can't conveyed with free text or images. Abu badali(talk)12:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It was added to the Wikipe-tan gallery a couple of days ago as a Wikipe-tan variant; I think it's strange to call that "used in Wikipe-tan." TomTheHand16:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure that I follow. Are you saying that any Wikipe variant one could cook up and link on the Wikipe-tan page deserves to be kept? If not, what makes this a keeper? TomTheHand17:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free news agency (New York Times) photo used to illustrate events being depicted in photo, failing WP:NFCC #2 and #8 and possibly #1. Now it's argued on the image description page that the photo itself was controversial. If article(s) can be rewritten to talk about the controversy and those statements are backed up with citations to reliable sources, then I will happily withdraw this nomination. howcheng {chat}17:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free press agency (Associated Press) photo, where the photo is not required for the reader's comprehension, thus failing both WP:NFCC #2 and #8. howcheng {chat}17:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This non-free media contributes significantly to the article. It significantly increases readers' understanding of the topic in a way that words alone cannot, by visually showing the Senate Watergate committee that brought down President Nixon. It conveys the somber and serious atmosphere at the time, and visually shows the central role played by Fred Thompson. This photo is historic and very relevant to the article in which it is used. It is also the only photo in that article showing Thompson as a young man. Subsequent to when this photo was uploaded, its size and resolution were reduced to ensure fair use.Ferrylodge18:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Images was uploaded under fair use rational and is not being used in accordance with the fair use policy to use it for identification and critical commentary on the station ID or program and its contents — Grey Wanderer | Talk18:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
