Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homosexuality in Kingdom Hearts
Appearance
- Homosexuality in Kingdom Hearts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article based entirely on Original Research. Also a fictional topic that has not received "significant coverage" from real sources Corpx 07:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - orphan article that seems to be Original Research. Guroadrunner 07:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Many games and anime have characters who are always put together by the fans as a couple, sometimes the pairings result in homosexual (yaoi/yuri) stuff. However, Wikipedia should not cover entries like this. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 07:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. article seems to be mainly OR. Onopearls 14:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 15:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Original research, just like the others said. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete because items like "holding hands" meets the vague criteria for "homosexuality". The page doesn't seem to have any thing worth merging to other pages. NobutoraTakeda 16:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete, total original research. Not at all significant. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 16:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete... not that my opinion is needed here ;) OR through and through. EyeSereneTALK 18:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- I opened this wondering what the heck I missed by not finishing Kingdom Hearts II... oh, it's just fanon and OR. Never mind! Delete Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - No real references, original research, and would confuse somebody not familiar with the video game series. (Guyinblack25 21:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC))
- Delete while agreeing with all above. The article itself is fuzzy and lacks any real level of context. --Stormbay 22:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as poorly written/unwikified, OR, and mostly unsourced (except a fan site which is often a doubtful type of source)--JForget 22:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds like a big joke to me. I may be wrong, but whoever wrote it must've done it just to get a laugh. Delete that sucker. Magicallydajesus 02:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)