File:Old Poh Ern Shih Temple.jpg

The old Poh Ern Shih Temple before it was demolished to make way for the construction of a new and bigger building in 2003.

• Credits: Poh Ern Shih Temple, Singapore.
• Image use with permission granted by Lee Boon Siong, Honorary President/Director of Poh Ern Shih Temple.

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work: To illustrate the subject in question Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Old_Poh_Ern_Shih_Temple.jpg true

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale. This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

Though this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:

1. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because the photo and its historical significance are the object of discussion in the article.
2. No free alternative can be made as the building was torn down.
3. This image is used for non-commercial, educational purposes.
4. The image won't affect the value of the copyright as it's of fairly low resolution compared to the original.