User talk:Harej

Welcome to my talk page!

Please add all messages under its own header on the bottom.
If you need an urgent response, email me.
- You should also take a look at my MessedRocker On-The-Fly box on my user page
If you leave a message here, I will respond on your user page. I expect you likewise to make your follow-up response (if applicable) on my page, and so forth. The exception is for trivial responses (like "ok" or "thank you") and if the messenger is not registered.

Conversations are automatically archived the week after the latest comment on my talk page.

Toolserveraccount

Hello Messedrocker,
please send your real-name, your wikiname, your prefered login-name and the public part of your ssh-key to . We plan to create your account soon then. --DaB.

Signing for archiving MessedRocker (talk) 05:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Barresi

Please direct your attention to the Paul Barresi article. I am writing to you because of your recent action in protecting the article. It appears that editors Roz Lipschitz and Robin Redford (perhaps one and the same) have gone on a recent disruptive tagging spree in this article and others, tantamount to vandalism. At first view this article shows more "citation needed" tags than text itself. Perhaps some further action to protect this article is indicated? 72.68.116.240 20:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editors Roz Lipschitz and Robin Redford in this article and elsewhere

These editors' overall activity should be looked at, too. They've gone on a tagging spree in this article, and they've made some wasteful and some strange edits here and elsewhere. In this article alone Roz Lipschitz made 17 edits in a recent three-day period and Robin Redford made 31 edits in a three-day period. 72.68.30.226 12:07, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing wrong with tagging stuff as citation-needed if it needs it. For now, I've removed the gossipy stuff from the article. It's still a pretty lousy article, though. MessedRocker (talk) 13:54, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TY 72.68.30.226 14:26, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template on TfD

I have userfied the template you requested here: User:MessedRocker/Aartalk. Best, IronGargoyle 02:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Mowatt

Is the "temporary" state going to be permanent? -- Hoary 15:06, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Then whose directives were you following? -- Hoary 23:56, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Credentials

That would be awesome! --David Shankbone 21:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 33	13 August 2007	About the Signpost

CC 3.0 licenses accepted on Commons	Reviewing five software requests
WikiWorld comic: "2000s"	News and notes: Meetup, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links on TDC's page

Can you remove the links on TDC's userpage that I took down a little while ago? Those links serve no purpose and TDC knows me so I can always explain it to him if he wonders.--MONGO 01:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links on Morton Devoshires page

Hi, I like your user name! This is where I got my idea for my list for friends links, from Morton Devoshire. Link Is it okay to have a list of people as long as it is a different distinctive sub-page? If yes I will re-make my list on a different distinctive page. If no, will you ask him to remove his list, or is he one of the people (like some say) that do not have to follow the rules here? Thank you. Bmedley Sutler 03:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, for full disclosure, it started off as a "spooks" list which in reality was an enemies list which has changed as objections started. Morton's is a true friends list....for what it's worth. RxS 03:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Friends? You make me laugh! Its a list of people who share his exact POV on certain issues mostly 9/11. "Man in Black (Admin who deleted the Problem-Reaction-Solution and is a hater of cruft, / Mmx1 -- hangs out at September 11, 2001 attacks. -- rl" That's okay then? And this is okay?"(Note: review [1] and [2] for more friendly folks)" Thank you. Bmedley Sutler 04:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

Could you please unprotect my user page. Thanks for watching out. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 13:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFCbot

Hi there! Since your bot appears to have taken RFC for now, could you please look at Template:RFCpolicy list? There appears to be some syntax conflict there. Thanks. >Radiant< 09:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm not sure which of you does the development, but if it's you I'll relay these suggestions that some people made: first, could the RFC list be ordered chronologically rather than alphabetical, and second, could the bot automatically remove the RFC templates from talk pages if over a month old. Incidentally the problem with the RFCpolicy page may be that it seeds from {{proposed}} as well as {{RFCpolicy}}, and the two have different syntax. HTH! >Radiant< 09:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of video game collector and limited editions

As I said on IRC: I feel this should go in AFD, but I don't think the support to delete it is there. I brought up a discussion about it here: [3] (last month), and everyone seems to want it kept. But the sourcing is the problem: IGN (a gaming website only from what I know) is the main source used. Not many outside sources saying "This limited edition is coming out for Mario Brothers 3", that aren't just pure gaming sites. Even if sourcing was better: it's still leans towards fancruft and listcruft. DVDs have many special editions as well: I doubt a list would be notable to make for Wikipedia. In my view, many of the people wanting it kept are letting their personal views on video games get in the way. Do you have any other thoughts or suggestions on what I should do? Otherwise: feel free to nominate it, perhaps opinion has changed on it. RobJ1981 19:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mystery text on Template:Wider attention list

There's some strange extra text, "add |reason= and explain why its being listed if your not linking to a section", on Template:Wider attention list. I tried deleting it, but sure enough, the bot put it back. It was first added by BetacommandBot at 14:39 on 7 August 2007, here. —Steve Summit (talk) 00:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, Do Not Delete

You have a funny thought to the simpsons. You think some simpsons articles have to be deleted. You must be anti-simpsons or something. If these articles are deleted, I will be starting my own wiki for the simpsons. JoeyLovesSports 01:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]