User talk:Cocoma

This is Cocoma's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Image tagging for Image:SonyEricssonZ610.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SonyEricssonZ610.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Issue resolved as of 11 March. Cocoma 15:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Working Man's Barnstar

Many thanks for this award. TerriersFan 23:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No prob! Cocoma 23:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Using subst in templates

It is a good habit, especially for user warnings, to use "subst" before the template name. For example:

{{subst:uw-test2|Whatever}} -- ~~~~

That will reduce processing time when the page is displayed. There is a bot that will come along eventually and insert the "subst" if you forget. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 23:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Will insert subst in the future. Cocoma 23:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Xiaxue.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Xiaxue.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn 10:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Campus Superstar

Hello! It quite disturbing for you to remove the scores and songs of every round of the competition. It doesn't really tell others what Campus Superstar really is when you removed those information. People want to see and know the progress and history of Campus Superstar. You possibly don't watch Campus Superstar. Your move angered many who are watching and had spend their time editing the article over these 2 years. kiewzhenyi 13:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you taken the time to read WP:NOT? Wikipedia is not a fan site, neither is it a journalism. Please take the discussion on Campus SuperStar's talk page and not breaking the 3RR rule.Cocoma 16:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I do not think this make Wikipedia a fansite. Firstly, if posting results of every match make this a fansite, consider soccer cups and leagues. Just look at articles like UEFA Cup and you will know what I mean. Next, I think it is appropriate for the scores to be in because this is part of the history of the competition. I think you must have some biaseness against Singapore's TV shows or even Singapore, you are not showing that you are objective by your actions. kiewzhenyi 14:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I removed your report on WP:AIV as it is an edit dispute and not simple vandalism. 3RR is only reached with the 4th revert - consecutive edits count as 1 revert - and should be reported on the appropriate page. Agathoclea 16:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apple TV Converter

Just a note about the tag on the article: ~~one of my favourite misquotations of CSD A1 is that is for "nonsense". In fact, it's for unintelligible stuff, not the merely nonsensical.~~ (sorry, you said A1, not G1). In fact, I don't understand how this either of A1 or A3, but I'll delete it for a better reason. Splash - tk 20:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is written in a way of blatant advertisement and with very minimal content that is on the NPOV. Viewing through the history, it makes me wonder if this article is simply an advert promoted wiki. The style of writing throughout all the other products by Wondershare are also the same. Feel free to note me on the 'better reason' if you are okay to tell me :)Cocoma 21:07, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

The following copied from User:121.6.64.153:

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Odex. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cocoma 13:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:121.6.64.153 here, you will be blocked from editing. Editing other users' pages is considered as vandalism. Do so on talk. As a side note, I personally don't see how saying "I sure hope you aren't an ODEX employee or Stephen Sing himself" can be considered an attack, as I never said that they (ODEX employee or Stephen Sing) were bad. If you do claim they are insults, you are also claiming that they (ODEX employee or Stephen Sing) are bad. --121.6.64.153 15:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]