User talk:Doc sameer
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This is Doc sameer's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Welcome!
Hello, Doc sameer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —Dwaipayan (talk) 03:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Notability
Heya, citing a band's own website does not in any way show notability. Please very carefully read WP:N before removing the cleanup tag. It needs to cite RELIABLE SECONDARY sources. This means nothing connected to the band, fan websites, forums, etc... - superβεεcat 22:05, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Great job providing sources and satisfying notability. Looks great! - superβεεcat 22:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, you were very polite to superbeecat, but it seems to me that he/she is too enthusiastic about deleting articles as they are being started. I would be interested to know if very many article writers are feeling harassed, rather than helped by this approach Cuvtixo 19:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- I am myself a moderator of many forums & i can relate to her way of approach. As long as we have the conviction that the work being done is genuine, i dont think it matters about anyone's over enthusiasm. I dont have any problems with her/him. Please try to avoid politics on Wikipedia & avoid vandalism as well(your poem at superbeecat's page). Thx :) --Doc sameer 19:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Roxen logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Roxen logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Re: Merging
If you feel strongly that it should stay and be expanded, then I can respect that. It's actually good that you do, because as it is I had completely forgotten the whole issue. My main request would be that information relevant to how all Muslims view it be added, as the nafs is important to a number of Islamic movements in addition to many Sufis. Let me know what you think, and don't ever feel shy to poke your nose in, as we're all here to improve the articles. MezzoMezzo 00:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have to admit, I am a bit pensive about that. While I think it would be a great idea and in an ideal world would love to help you and other editors with that, I also know that my endorsement will bring certain expectations upon me as far as getting motivated and doing work goes. You have my tacit support for the time being, though. MezzoMezzo 04:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Atif Aslam
Thanks for contributing to Atif Aslam's wiki. Can you believe, he didn't had a page just 24 hours ago!!!
Your signature
Per policies, could you please tone your signature down? Its a little too loud. Current:
I suggest:
thanks, --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 23:52, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Leprosy sections
You are entirely correct that WP:MEDMOS#Sections calls for Causes/Genetics sections to appear early in an article. "Genetics" in this usage, however, is usually regarding human genetic factors that influence a disease state or progression. For example, in the leprosy article if we had a significant section on the genetic changes that lead to increased susceptibility to M. leprae, that section would go exactly where you indicated. In this particular case, however, the genetics of M. leprae actually belong in the Mycobacterium leprae article, not the leprosy one and I've moved the section there. Note that the above is my opinion - if you have a different viewpoint that I have missed, please leave me a note here so we can discuss it. Thank much. -- MarcoTolo 01:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)