Template talk:Unreliable

Previous discussion

This template was created as a result of discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/Unreferenced GA task force#Types_of_referencing_problems. — Armed Blowfish (talk|mail) 02:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on wording change please

I'm requesting that the wording be changed back. The issue at hand is not that the information is not verifiable--it is that it isn't verified. It doesn't matter if it can be verified--if the information is verifiable--if someone who reads the article can verify the information--the issue is that the information hasn't already been verified and presented as such. This new wording is bad--able and already done are too very different things and our policies require that we do it--not that we are able to. Miss Mondegreen | Talk 03:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I changed it back. The page isn't protected though. —Centrx→talk • 04:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow--you're totally right, I think I was editing too many templates at once and had a little brain rot there. Weird. Thanks though. Miss Mondegreen | Talk 04:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've created the exact same template as this, basically...

Template:Unreliablesources ...--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 19:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs link to talk page

This template needs a link to the talk page of the article, where the editor lists what sources he considers unreliable, and where other editors may add their opinions. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 12:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]