User talk:Xaosflux/Archive23
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Xaosflux. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
MFD notice
Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Selfworm/Userboxes/NotCatholic_(2nd_nomination) As you are an editor involved with the the previous discussion, I am notifying you that I have relisted it for mfd. Thank you. --Flamgirlant 11:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Reactivating WikiProject Rave
I just became aware of the project so I joined and I have reactivated it from its status of inactive – Wikipedia:WikiProject Rave. __meco 10:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Ray Chi article deletion
Hi, I wrote the article on Ray Chi that you recently deleted. I did not have computer access for a few days and didn't get the message until today. I could have easily sited or referenced various items in the article and wish I would have had more time to do so. Is there any way to get the article back? I was actually going to add to it soon because he's done more work lately that would make him even more noteworthy than he already is. Shatner1 21:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
EndUN Userbox
Hi, you recently participated in the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DieWeisseRose/Userboxes/EndUN discussion. I have reluctantly submitted the closing statement by User:Tony Sidaway for deletion review. Please consider taking a look at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_1#User:DieWeisseRose.2FUserboxes.2FEndUN. Thanks. --DieWeisseRose 02:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:26, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Bot Approval BoxCrawler
I have a request pending at the requests for approval page and would like your input (as you are part of the BAG) if it's not too much trouble. I'm glad to answer any questions or concerns you may have. Adam McCormick 23:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Test Run is complete, edits may be seen here Adam McCormick 06:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have responded to the errors you found, and have changed the bot accordingly, please let me know if there are more problems or when I can run again Adam McCormick 20:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have responded to your comment. We keep a list of infoboxes at the project page, and I have left several links at the test review. Adam McCormick 23:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have also changed the bot to respond to any div box (either <div> tags or '{|') that uses the class infobox. Let me know when I can Run another trial. Thanks! Adam McCormick 18:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Retrial has been run and the rusults may be seen here Adam McCormick 04:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I haven't heard anything else about the trial in about a week, is there something else you'd like me to do to get approval? Adam McCormick 02:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Retrial has been run and the rusults may be seen here Adam McCormick 04:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have responded to the errors you found, and have changed the bot accordingly, please let me know if there are more problems or when I can run again Adam McCormick 20:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 28 | 9 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
My RfB
 |
Thank you, Xaosflux, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3). |
Why
why did you delete my request for adminship page to nominate myself--Physik 14:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
MFD
I've transcluded Portal:Catholicism/Popes in to Portal:Pope/Popes to prevent forking, but to allow portal consistancy if anyone ever wanted it. Do you think this is a good fix, or do you want to continue with the MFD? Thanks, — xaosflux Talk 03:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- The point is that Portal:Pope/Popes is not used anywhere. Do you think there's some reason to keep it? --Abu badali (talk) 03:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply, I've reverted myself. I don't really have an opinion one way or another on that page, but do note that although it is orphaned, it is only a week old, have you talk'ed the creator?. — xaosflux Talk 04:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm... I haven't noticed it is only one week old! --Abu badali (talk) 04:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply, I've reverted myself. I don't really have an opinion one way or another on that page, but do note that although it is orphaned, it is only a week old, have you talk'ed the creator?. — xaosflux Talk 04:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 29 | 16 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
hey your not nice by sending that message
well did you write that? Just please take all the cuss words out.i'm sorry i deleated it just fix it up.i didn like all those cuss words in it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SilverQuarters (talk • contribs).
- Replied on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 23:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
its me SilverQuarters
- look on your talk
- Well ok do you want to be friends answer back on my talk.ok.tell me if your a boy or girl it dosent matter either one is fine
- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SilverQuarters (talk • contribs).
you can go to User:SilverQuarters and type anything you want.but one rule no cuss words. from, SilverQuarters 13:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
MfD thanks
Thanks. I meant to explicitly include the subpages but forgot. --ElKevbo 03:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
UCFD
It is actually not archived yet, but I was using that edit summary as it will be there soon and if I use the current location, no one will be able to find it later. For now it is still @ Wikipedia:User categories for discussion#Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians --After Midnight 0001 04:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- You are welcome. BTW, this wouldn't have happened if we used page-per-day for UCFD like we do for CFD, but I don't feel like setting that all up. See you later. --After Midnight 0001 04:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 30 | 23 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
As you are already aware, Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians and its subcategories, including Category:Discordian Wikipedians, Category:Flying Spaghetti Monsterist Wikipedians, Category:SubGenius Wikipedians, and others, have been deleted. That deletion is now up for review. If you have anything you'd like to say on the subject, now is the time. If you know of any other editors who might have something to say on the subject, pass the word. If, on the other hand, you are not interested in the slightest, feel free to delete this. — Bigwyrm watch mewake me 09:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Vote at CfD
Hello. I think you have used sound reasoning in saying that some of the generation categories should be deleted and some not - I agree this could be beneficial. However, I was wondering if you would alter your vote to say that the "Wikipedians in their XXs" should be kept and the "Generation XYZ" should be deleted. I say this for two reasons (A) which generation one considers him/herself is POV, and there is even conflict among sociologists about which Generation should be called what and at what ages; (2) The "Wikipedians in their XXs" is not POV and editors are added and updated automatically if they use one of several user age templates, thus requiring less maintenance. I would imagine that these have a stronger chance of surviving and actually being useful in the future. Depending on what you decide, you can change your vote here.--Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 15:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
A little of your time
Would you be able to take a little time to look at user Mind meal (talk, edits), who is incivil, makes threats and tries to intimidate editors. Others have attempted to advise the user, but perhaps you might be able to give it a try.
Please urge the use of edit Summaries and the Preview button to reduce edit clutter. Thank you. Hu 04:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 31 | 30 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't quite understand why you changed the speedy-delete tag on this article to a prod. Explain, please. Realkyhick 05:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Response is on my page, since you copied my first message there; helps keep things organized. Realkyhick 16:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 32 | 6 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Bot Error
Yep, this is why we have BRFA. I noticed another serious error, so I went and reverted the edits, as it made the talkpage below act very unusually. Please fix the error I detailed and re-run the trial for 5 edits. Sorry for all the mucking around! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 02:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:SickGirlInPyjamas.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:SickGirlInPyjamas.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Go away bot, you are too fast! — xaosflux Talk 02:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
SilverQuarters 13:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for giving that welcoming page Xaosflux.I hope you leave more messagess.And I didnt know it was vandilism by deleting stuff.i hope no more vandils will mess with WIKIPEDIA.
WP:CVU status
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- what pages of mine are being consitered for deletion??? just wondering b/c i am unsure of what article(s) or pages your are refuring too... thanks, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 23:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 01:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Reply: Thank you for letting me know. Ramírez 22:00, August 10 2007 (UTC)