User talk:Resolute
1 - until Nov 22, 2006 |
1812 in popular culture
Hi, Resolute. Sorry for reposting the article, I was completely unaware of the debate and deletion. Thanks. DagosNavy 11:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Just to Let You Know
I'm a newpage army, okay. GoldEmerald 11:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Hart Trophy
In response to your suggestion, I have added as many free use images of the winners as I could find. Although I added a few too many and I'll have to remove about four. -- Scorpion0422 02:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Noticed your vote earlier. There are other Afd debates there, where minor leaguers are nominated for deletion.--Truest blue 23:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello WikiProject Ice Hockey/Participant
I am an advisor to the National Hockey League. With your help over the next few months I plan to review and correct any information on wikipedia relating to the National Hockey League, its franchises, players, executives and partership organisations. I am here to provide you with information. Your work is appreciated. --NHLsource 18:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Adminship
Hey Resolute, I have a question for you. Are you interested in becoming an administrator? I see no reason why you wouldn't make it (in case you didn't know I am one), you've been here almost as long as I have... you've got the good edit count in all the right places, and I've never noticed you being uncivil. Let me know if your interested and I'll put forward a nomination for you. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 23:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, well I'll try and get that nomination in sometime tomorrow afternoon, I don't think i'll be able to get any kind of decent nom done in time tonight as I should pack it in soon, but good to know your interested and we'll see how you do. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 00:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 19:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Good answers, I think the nom looks good and I would be utterly shocked if you aren't accepted. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 21:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hey no problem at all, you deserve it... successful RFA's make you feel the best about editing on Wikipedia... and you answered all your questions well and no one has dug up any dirt on you as of yet (which is impressive, because there are a few voters who are like sharks, they just pounce on the worst of the people), but I don't think they'll find anything. Cheers from Ontario, mate! Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 01:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Good answers, I think the nom looks good and I would be utterly shocked if you aren't accepted. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 21:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hahahahah, street cred, that's brilliant! It'll probably rank somewhere in the middle of my top ten for my upcoming BLOW list.... Best Laughs on Wikipedia. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 00:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
RFA
Congratulations! You are close to becoming an administrator. You have a lot of support and little or no opposition!
I did add a question. If you answer this well, this can only help more flock to you and support you! You don't need me to help you answer it but if you really want possible answers, just ask me. WKPDX 02:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi
Recently, you said that this material should be Speedily deleted here. However, an editor has come along, removed the copyright violations, sourced the article, and reduced to a stub. As such, your further input, considering the changes, would be highly valued, and your comment on whether you endorse his motion to close the debate or not would also be excellent. Regards -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks anyway, but it has been decided that, since the copvio has been removed, the article should not be deleted. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. I would have happily withdrawn my !vote had the AfD not already been closed. Cheers, Resolute 06:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
National Hockey League awards
Hi, I noticed that you will be working on National Hockey League awards, which will be tricky. I think it would be best to turn it into a chart because it is MUCH easier to pass an FL than an FA. It also wouldn't hurt to include an image of each trophy (you can make an image column on a chart, like this). Either way, it's your call. -- Scorpion0422 00:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well, as part of another FT I'm working on, someone (not me) made this page, which summarizes the topic and is a current FLC (I think it is heading towards a pass) so you could start with that and make the columns: Award/Trophy, Criteria, Year it was first awarded (better title needed), Recent Winner(s). The images are optional, but in the WWE champions page, it used to have an image of each champion, but somebody in the FLC requested that they be remove. So, perhaps it would be best to avoid the individual images. Again, it's your call. -- Scorpion0422 00:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
my mistake
my mistake thanksApelike 15:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Your RfA was successful
Congratulations, I have closed your RfA as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Good luck! --Deskana (banana) 20:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Congrats! -- JamesTeterenko 21:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Wohoo! so many new buttons! Thanks to everyone who supported me. :o) Resolute 21:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations!! Maxim(talk) 22:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Congrats Resolute, didn't I say you'd be a shoo-in? If you feel like showing off your sysop status, go down to the WikiProject Participants section and put the qualification beside your name. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 22:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Congrats! Now, get to work! :) Jmlk17 22:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- <whimpers> Resolute 22:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Congrats! Now, get to work! :) Jmlk17 22:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Way to go dude. I knew you would be an admin when I first saw you years ago. Actually think I thought you were back then. --Djsasso 00:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Rock on! Now get the mop and start working! --Hirohisat Talk 00:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations. I know I didn't vote (too lazy), but best of luck and use the mop well. -- Scorpion0422 03:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Rock on! Now get the mop and start working! --Hirohisat Talk 00:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Start the conga-ratulations line. See your first talk below! LOL :-). Flibirigit 17:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Scarborough Van Assembly
I am reverting copyright violations and non-free use of photos at the Scarborough Van Assembly article. Would you please review? Thanks. Flibirigit 16:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Deletion log history
Hey Resolute!
I was perusing your deletion logs, and you're doing a fine job in deleting speedy pages. The only thing that I'd advise you on is to fill in the deletion summary with more than just what's automatically in the box for speedy pages. The reason for this is that you may accidentally leave the text of a copyright vio or an attack page in the deletion summary and thus in the deletion log. Only a dev can alter the deletion log, so it's better safe than sorry and now's the time to start building good habits. There are a couple scripts available that'll provide a drop down summary option.
Keep up the good work! Keegantalk 04:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Archiving request
Hi! I'm one of the WP:HOCKEY/SWEDEN editors.
Firstly, just wanted to say grats to the adminship (is it a cyberspaceship?). Respect. :)
Also, I would like to politely request - you or someone else more experienced than me - to create Archive13 for WT:HOCKEY (or Archive14 if the project is superstitious). Talkpage has grown a lot since last time (see table. I know how to do tables anyway...) and I guess some old topics should be cleaned at least when talkpage is twice the size of its largest archive page. I would do the process myself, but I'm not really sure how just yet, and the talk page is getting painfully slow on my old system. Didn't really want to post this to the project talkpage itself. Whenever you have the time. Or, forward it to someone else if not. And thanks, either way!
Talkpage | topics | kB |
---|---|---|
Archive1 | 23 | 64 |
Archive2 | 43 | 89 |
Archive3 | 48 | 94 |
Archive4 | 36 | 81 |
Archive5 | 58 | 113 |
Archive6 | 30 | 47 |
Archive7 | 26 | 29 |
Archive8 | 31 | 64 |
Archive9 | 45 | 77 |
Archive10 | 41 | 77 |
Archive11 | 34 | 114 |
Archive12 | 25 | 91 |
WT:HOCKEY | 79 | 228 |
Humbly,
-- Bamsefar75 00:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Woodland Stewards Article
In response to your note regarding the lack of notability, in comparing the article to others of a similar nature, I noticed there appeared to be no such information within those articles. How do I establish the needed notability within the article?
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcoyle (talk • contribs)
The Puppetmastaz
Why, instead of speedy deleting "The Puppetmastaz" stub, didn't you just drop a warning on my talk page, and then delete it in... say two days instead of the few hours when I was sleeping ? The band is very notable, in fact I wrote the stub because of an article in a nationwide newspaper in my country (France) that mentionned them as very notable, which hardily seems the case for all obscure bands mentionned in wikipedia ... So, please indicate me how I should recreate the page to conform with wikipedia's policy because I am a bit puzzled. Pointing to a verifiable source on why they are notable directly in the first revision would be enough or not ? Please answer on my own talk page, thanks.