User talk:Longkeys

John Cena

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to John Cena, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 17:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The source given is not verifiable because it does not list how he lost the matches (whether clean or from cheating or what not), so we can not add the content. Sorry. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 17:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And further more don't re-add the 23/4/07 match with HBK to the article, week by week events are not usually notable. Fansites will list results. And if you want to add sarcastic remarks the edit summary box is no the place to do it, take it to the talk page, if you feel you represent the consensus then you will be proven correct, however if the consensus is against you then abide by that result. Darrenhusted 20:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When content added goes against user consensus, and is repeatedly inserted anyway, it's vandalism. You are right that one person doesn't have the final say on any one thing, so stop adding those results, thank you. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 21:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to John Cena. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Bmg916^Speak 19:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to John Cena, you will be blocked from editing. The events in question are notable by consensus as evidenced by the fact you are the only one removing them, and at least three different editors have reverted you. Just because some information you added a month ago was considered week by week by other editors does not mean everything is considered as such. Please stop being pointy. Thank you. Bmg916^Speak 15:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POINT

Please do not attempt to disrupt this project to make a point such as you did here. Please refrain from this disruptive behavior or you may receive a temporary block to read and understands wikipedias policies. Thanks and good luck. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:24, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to John Cena, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop violating WP:POINT as well. Thank you. Bmg916^Speak 17:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. If you continue your disruptive behavior such as you did here with innapropriate accusations and threats, you will be blocked from editing. Thanks and good luck! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please do not call good faith edits vandalism such as you did here. While some edits may be contentious it is NOT vandalism unless it meets the definition from WP:VANDAL, "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. COninuing to call good faith edits vandalism amy also result in a temporary block. Thanks and good luck! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Cena

Your edit on the John Cena article was removed because the information you added is considered week by week and non notable for Wikipedia, not to mention you didn't bother to source it. It would be much more suitable for a dedicated wrestling wiki. On top of that your edit summary was completely misleading; calling it "general tidying and grammar changes", which there were none, "with a couple of additions" which is all it was. it was full of peacock terms, and in general unnecessary.

Also, please be careful not to remove things from talk pages when you add to them.«»bd(^talk _stalk) 14:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing a persons talk page is the best way to message them, however you need to be careful not to erase things not already on the page. The best way to go about it is to start a new conversation with the + sign at top (between "edit this page" and "history") and keep all related messages in there.«»bd(^talk _stalk) 14:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edit removed

Your edit was not a hidden warning note. It was more of a summary of a conversation you, allegedly, had with another editor. If you are going to include legitimate warning notes, please write in a more encyclopedic tone. - Deep Shadow 16:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]