Jump to content

User talk:24.18.130.89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.18.130.89 (talk) at 08:26, 27 September 2007 (→Blocked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:Matt Sanchez, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Krimpet 05:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for one week for assorted trolling, personal attacks, incivility and other disruption at User talk:Truthjusticeamericanway, after sufficient warning. Your comment "this account was blocked almost immediately after I opened it. I didn't have time to participate in anything else" suggests you are that same user evading a block, which is also prohibited. Comments including "Elonka, a liar who is...", "Hey idiot, this account was blocked almost immediately after I opened it"... and "What a pathetic bunch of losers you, JBBscribe and your friend Matt Sanchez are" don't help, either. Daniel→♦ 08:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Matt Sanchez

This is your last warning.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Talk:Matt Sanchez, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I have reverted ALL of your edits as a single group, as they all contained personal attacks against Sanchez. I have also mentioned this incident to an uninvolved admin, who can decide if you need to be blocked again. Horologium t-c 12:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should re-word your warning: "I am from Wikipedia and I will NOT stand for truth in these pages!" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.18.130.89 (talk) 16:48, August 22, 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for a month for disruption stemming from incivility and personal attacks. In addition to your previous block for similar things, comments like "Sanchez, you are a homosexual, so your input should be rejected too", "It is people like you who have made Wikipedia such a joke", "Wikipedia is hiding details about Sanchez's past. He was a whore throughout the 1990s and throughout this decade, but this website has censored that information", "Don't worry, [name removed], we know that you haven't given analingus to other men on screen since, oh, what was it, 1994?", etc. etc., all in the last day after being told to stop it, are extremely disruptive and do not assist in creating a collaborative encyclopedia. Cut it out, please. Daniel 23:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

As you are again editing from this IP to avoid the block on your account(s), I have blocked this IP from editing Wikipedia for 6 months. WjBscribe 20:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, WJBscribe, a liar who was quoted in the New York Times in support of fraud by a senior Wikipedia official ...
Just wanted to express my 100 percent support for everything you do around here. I think you were totally entitled to protect your identity. Don't let the fuss get you down! - WBJscribe, quoted in The New York Times in support of Ryan Jordan, a senior Wikipedia official who was caught lying about his background on Wikipedia and to The New Yorker
... tells lies here, too. In fact, any common idiot can look directly above and see that my editing was blocked for a month. Not that telling the truth ever once mattered to anyone at Wikipedia.
I have already been informed that WJBscribe's clique at Wikipedia has backed him up. In fact, Allison, a Wikipedia liar-ette with no more ethics than Jimmy Wales or WJBscribe, censored my response here, calling it "soap-boxing." Wikipedia just hates it when people argue back, arrogating to itself the right to launch personal attacks on errant users while characterising their responses as "trolling" or "soap-boxing." Stalin would be pleased at how well his pupils learned his lessons.
This is only to be expected, but the reality for Wikipedia is that the "user edited encyclopedia" is now the punch line to an international joke. One-third of Wikipedia's administrators are under the age of 18, and another one-third are between 18 and 25. This project should be renamed "The Children's Encyclopedia." As with children everywhere, Wikipedia really isn't too good with facts. Adults worldwide are rapidly recognizing it. Here's a good one: Wikipedia actually thinks it can fix this with a "trusted editor" system. Folks, when you put children in power in an organization founded by a 38-year-old going on 16, there isn't anyone to trust the trusters.
Oh, and the page in dispute, the Matt Sanchez article, has been locked down by Wikipedia's censors to prevent the introduction of pesky verified facts. Is it any wonder that Wikipedia is in active negtiations with the Chinese government to commence operations there? They fit together so well! 24.18.130.89 07:04, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.18.130.89&oldid=160653263"